You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
GROMIA 343<br />
The barramunda is credited with the power of going on land, or at least mud-flats. As the fish is heavy, and<br />
its pectoral and ventral fins or limbs weak, it is in no way adapted to land transit. It is, however, quite equal<br />
to making considerable progress on a marshy soft bottom. While the fish is beheved to have the power of leaving<br />
the water for short intervals and of breathing by its lung alone, it is more than doubtful if it can survive in a healthy<br />
condition for any length of time out of water. The perfect state of its gills favours this beUef, -and its one lung<br />
would be quite inadequate for protracted air-breathing purposes. What in all probability happens is, that the lung<br />
is an auxihary structure, and that the fish breathes habitually by its gills, and employs its lung as an adjunct for<br />
taking in great gulps of air when the animal, partly asphyxiated by the gases of the foul water, rises to the surface,<br />
which it is constantly in the habit of doing when the conditions of breathing are rendered difficult.<br />
The rising to the surface for the purpose of breathing air also obtains in the sea mammals, where no gills are<br />
present, and oxygenation of the blood is effected wholly by the employment of lungs.<br />
One of the most remarkable animals as far as breathing is concerned is the axolotl (Siredon jrisciformis). It<br />
is provided with six feathery-looking gills, which are arranged on the outside of the body separately, three on each<br />
side of the head. The axolotl is a water-breather, and confines its operations exclusively to this medium. Some<br />
years since Professor Haeckel ^ asserted that this quaint creature can convert itself from a water-breather into an<br />
air-breather, and he instances some experiments to this effect which he asserts were made at the Zoological Gardens,<br />
Paris, where a large number of axolotls are kept and bred. This statement requires to be taken with the extreme<br />
of caution, and is as follows : " The water-salamanders, or tritons, which have been artificially made to retain their<br />
original gills, are extremely interesting in this respect. The tritons are amphibious animals, nearly akin to frogs,<br />
and possess, like the latter, in their youth external organs of respiration— gills—with which they, while hving in<br />
water, breathe the air dissolved in the water. At a later date a metamorphosis takes place in tritons, as in frogs.<br />
They leave the water, lose their gills, and accustom themselves to breathe with their lungs. But if they are prevented<br />
from doing this by being kept shut up in a tank, they do not lose their gills. The gills remain, and the water-<br />
salamander continues through Ufe in that low stage of development, beyond which its lower relations, the gilled<br />
salamanders, or Sozobranchiata,^ never pass." It will be observed that the experiments referred to in this quota-<br />
tion are wholly artificial, and of httle or no value as far as exact science is concerned. He continues, " Great interest<br />
was caused a short time ago, among zoologists, by the axolotl (Siredon pisciformis), a gilled salamander from Mexico,<br />
nearly related to the triton ; it had already been known for a long time, and been bred on a large scale in the<br />
Zoological Gardens in Paris. This animal possessess external gills, like the young salamander, but retains them all its<br />
life, like all other Perermibranchiata. This gilled salamander generally remains in the water, with its aquatic organs<br />
of respiration, and also propagates itself there. Bvt in the Paris garden, unexpectedly from among hundreds of these<br />
animals, a small number crept out of the water on to the dry land, lost their gills, and changed themselves into gill-less<br />
salamanders, which cannot be distinguished from a North American genus of tritons (Amblystoma), and breathe only<br />
through limgs." (The itahcs are mine.)<br />
I cannot help feeUng that some important error has been committed in this connection. Of course, Haeckel<br />
admits the whoUy artificial nature of the experiments, but he seems to have mixed up conditions which are essen-<br />
tially separate and distinct, and which are even contradictory in their nature. They are altogether at variance with<br />
similar experiments made by myself with young frogs, where the artificial and objectionable features were eliminated.<br />
I found that a period arrives in the development of the frog when nature must have fair play and free play. This<br />
occurs when the lungs are fully developed and the gills have become useless as water-breathing organs. If at this<br />
stage no provision be made for the young frogs leaving the water, resting, and breathing air, they are drowned. It<br />
is necessary under the circumstances to erect in the aquarium small, slanting, elevated platforms of stone, brick, earth,<br />
or some such material, to permit the young frogs to leave the water and to breathe air at discretion and imder favour-<br />
able conditions. It would defeat the object in view to confine the young frogs exclusively to the water when their<br />
arrangements for living in that element have disappeared. We might as well expect the eye to see and the ear to<br />
hear when the organs of sight and hearing have, from some cause or other, been destroyed.<br />
It is not permissible to substitute an artificial for a natural process in a growing organism, especially if the<br />
artificial arrangements are opposed to nature and bar progress. If an experiment gives an unnatural bias to or<br />
stints development, it at once becomes misleading, and Uttle or no importance can be attached to it.<br />
The foregoing affords no proof that the important respiratory processes can be indefinitely modified, and that<br />
a water-breathing animal can, within a comparatively short period, be converted into an air-breathing one. Such<br />
a possibiUty would upset the whole scheme of nature, and lead to the dangerous conclusion that all parts of plants<br />
and animals are interchangeable, and that the one is directly or indirectly manufactured out of the other.<br />
In this connection it may be useful to state that the sea mammals, such as the whales, porpoises, dugongs,<br />
1 "The History of Creation," vol. i. p. 259 ei seq.<br />
" Ordinarily known as Perennibranchiata.