2013_14 IDP Review.pdf - KZN Development Planning

3.6 CROSS CUTTINGTable 41: Development, submission and implementation rate of SDF’s2009/10 2010/11 2011/12Municipality SDFs SDFs SDFs SDFs SDFs SDFs SDFs SDFsapproved submitted Implemented approved submitted Implemented approved submittedUmzinyathi YesYes as partYes as partYes as partYesYesYesYesof the IDPof the IDPof the IDPEndumeni YesYes as partYes as partYes as partYesYesYesYesof the IDPof the IDPof the IDPNquthu No NO No YesYes as partYes as partYesYesof the IDPof the IDPSDFsImplementedMsinga No NO No No NO No No YES Not as yetUmvotiYesYes as partof the IDPYesYesYes as partof the IDPYesYesYes as partof the IDPYesYeYeYesReasonsUnavailabilityof fundingUnavailabilityof funding3.6.1 SDFs: CHALLENGESFinancial:Challenges identified within parameters of the SDF vary from each municipality to the next within the district. Due to the shortage of funds,spatial development frameworks, are not usually reviewed timeously. It is for this reason that funding for this is always sourced externally.For instance, Msinga Municipality has been without an appropriate SDF which serves as a spatial implementation tool of the IDP. However,through intervension by the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform, Vuka Africa was appointed to undertake the exercise onbehalf of the municipality. uMvoti municipality utilised their old SDF in the new IDP, however, interventions have been put in place to adressthis disjuncture. Nquthu’s SDF on the other hand require slight amendments so that it incorporates the revised ward boundaries asdetermined by the Municipal Demarcation Board. Meanwhile, the challenges identified within SDF’s are not major, hence they have beenmitigated through various efforts.Draft 2013/14 IDP Review Page 312Prepared by Umzinyathi District Municipality22 March 2013