06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

Nooriabad spinning unit to shahkot weaving unit for the manufacture of fabrics. The taxable<br />

goods i.e. fabrics produced at the Shahkot weaving unit from the aforesaid yarn, were taxable<br />

goods i.e., on payment of sales tax on local supplies and as zero-rated on export. No tax invoice<br />

was issued nor any sales tax charged by the Nooriabad spinning unit at the time of the transfer of<br />

yarn. Consequently, the shahkot weaving unit also did not claim any input tax on aforesaid<br />

transfer of yarn. However, on the basis of an internal Audit report Additional Collector.<br />

Collectorate of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> (East), Karachi, made out and adjudicated a case demanding payment<br />

of sales tax and additional tax on the aforesaid transfer of yarn being in a taxable supply. The<br />

audit team and the adjudicating officer, apparently, took the aforementioned action on account of<br />

separate branch registration by the registered person.<br />

3. Suraj Cotton Mills Limited, the registered person, contends that the transfer in question<br />

is not a taxable activity in the meaning of clause (35) of section 2 of the Act, nor does it constitute<br />

to be a taxable supply in the meaning of clause (33) and (41) ibid. A copy each of the written<br />

arguments on a behalf of the registered person and the impugned order in original No. 20 of 1997<br />

passed by the Additional Collector, <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> (East), Karachi is enclosed for ready reference. In<br />

my opinion the plea of the appellants is in order. However, it is felt that since the case involves a<br />

policy issue in respect of the registration of branches etc., a policy clarification from the Board<br />

appears to be necessary. An early communication in this regard would be highly appreciated.<br />

[Issued by the Collectorate of Customs, Central Excise & <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> (Appeals), Custom<br />

House, Karachi, under the signature of Mrs. Musrrat Jabeen, Collector (Appeals), South Zone.]<br />

********<br />

C. NO. 2(19)(STM)/98 DATED 7 TH DECEMBER, 1998<br />

SUBJECT:-<br />

NOTIFICATION NO SRO 826(I)/98, DATED 21.07.1998 ISSUED<br />

UNDER SECTION 60 OF THE SALES TAX ACT, 1990.<br />

I am directed to say that Notification No. SRO 826(I)/98, dated 21.07.1998<br />

issued under section 60 of the <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1990, is under review by the Federal<br />

Government. Accordingly, it is directed that no new ―Special Certificate of Registration‖<br />

be issued under the said Notification SRO 826(I)/98 without obtaining specific<br />

permission from the Central Board of Revenue.<br />

2. The Special Certificates of Registration, already issued under SRO<br />

826(I)/98 but surrendered by the parties, may be cancelled as surrendered and audit be<br />

conducted to determine if there remains any dues to be recovered from the party (so<br />

surrendering the certificates) on account of tax-free goods received by them but not<br />

exported.<br />

3. The Board understands that the following are the figures of special<br />

Registration under SRO 826(I)/98: --<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Collectorate<br />

No. of<br />

applications<br />

received for<br />

registration<br />

No. of Special<br />

Certificates of<br />

registration<br />

issued<br />

No. of Special<br />

Certificates of<br />

Registration<br />

surrendered<br />

No. of valid<br />

special<br />

Registrations<br />

as of today<br />

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)<br />

1. Hyderabad 1 Nil Nil Nil<br />

2. Rawalpindi 1 Nil Nil Nil

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!