06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

collectively, would not exceed Rs.2100/- per tonne, the assessable value of sugar for the purpose<br />

of sales tax was frozen at Rs.13000/- per tonne vide SRO. 207(I)/98 dated 31.03.1998 (Annex-V)<br />

read with SRO 208(I)/98 (Annex-VI). The incidence of sales tax was thus Rs.1625/- per tonne @<br />

12.5% and cumulative incidence (including CED) was Rs.2025 per tonne. On the eve of increase<br />

in rate of sales tax from 12.5% to 15%, the central excise duty was reduced to Rs.150 per tonne<br />

bringing the total incidence to Rs.2100 per tonne. At present, central excise duty is exempt and the<br />

assessable value for sales tax is frozen at Rs.14000/- per tonne, thus yielding sales tax of<br />

Rs.2100/- per tonne of sugar.<br />

2. Before 1 st April, 1998, certain manufacturers paid excise duty at the rate of Rs.2100/- per<br />

tonne, after preparation of proper AR.I prescribed under Central Excise Rules, but could not<br />

remove their goods from the factory before 1 st April, 1998. As sugar was supplied after 1 st of April,<br />

it became liable to sales tax, also under the sales tax law, irrespective of its having paid excise<br />

duty at old full rates prior to 1 st April, 1998.<br />

3. M/s. Haseeb Waqas Sugar Mills, Fauji Sugar Mills, and few others, who paid central<br />

excise duty at old full rates of Rs.2100/- per tonne but did not clear such duty paid sugar before 1 st<br />

of April, 1998, have approached CBR to resolve this issue. Their demand is that either sales tax<br />

may not be charged from them on that quantity of un-cleared sugar which has been subjected to<br />

old rate of excise duty OR the central excise duty in excess of Rs.400/- per metric tonne may be<br />

refunded to them.<br />

4. The Board feels that such cases are hardship cases as relevant date for purposes of<br />

payment of central excise duty is date of preparation of AR-1. The problem has arisen only<br />

because <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1990, does not recognize such an excise procedure and levies sales tax<br />

payable at the ―time of supply‖. However, equity demands that manufacturers should either pay<br />

excise duty @ Rs2100/- per tonne or composite tax of Rs.2025/- per tonne (excise duty of Rs.400/-<br />

plus sales tax of Rs.1625). Demanding Rs.3725/- per tonne (central excise duty of Rs.2100/- per<br />

tonne plus sales tax of Rs.1625/- per tonne) on such stock of sugar held by sugar mills on<br />

01.04.1998 should be unjust, harsh and inequitable.<br />

5. It is, therefore, proposed that sales tax of Rs.1625/- per metric tonne may not be charged<br />

from the sugar manufacturers on such quantity of un-cleared stock (as of 01.04.1998) of sugar in<br />

respect of which central excise duty has already been paid @ Rs.2100/- per tonne against AR-1<br />

prior to 01.04.1998 subject to the following conditions:-<br />

* Where sales tax has already been charged/recovered on such stocks of 01.04.1998, no<br />

cash refund of sales tax will be given. However, the manufacturers will be allowed to apply for<br />

adjusting the sales tax paid, if any, against their future liabilities. Collector of sales tax shall<br />

allow adjustment only in genuine and bonafide cases after due verifications;<br />

* The quantity of sugar which has been supplied to registered taxpayers (where possibility<br />

of claiming adjustment as input tax exists) will remain liable to sales tax. In such cases the central<br />

excise duty in excess of Rs.400/- per tonne will be refunded by the Collector of Central Excise<br />

after due verification.<br />

6. As CBR or federal Government has no more the powers to grant exemption of sales tax,<br />

the date of deposit of central excise duty (date of AR-1) will be deemed to be the ―time of supply‖<br />

for the purpose of sales tax, in such cases, as a special case.<br />

7. Approval of the Finance Minister is solicited to the proposals in paragraph 5 & 6 above.<br />

This will avoid audit objections and will still resolve the genuine and bona fide grievances of the<br />

sugar mills on the basis of fair play and equity.<br />

[Issued by the CBR, Islamabad, under the signature of Mr. S. M. Kazimi, Member (<strong>Sales</strong><br />

<strong>Tax</strong>).]<br />

********

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!