06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

above and to state that vide S. No. 53 of the Sixth Schedule to the <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1990<br />

cattle feed falling under PCT Headings No. 2302.1000, 2306.1000, 2306.7000 and<br />

2309.9000 is exempt from sales tax. This includes oil cakes of cotton seed and of maize<br />

(corn) gram used as cattle feed.<br />

[Issued by CBR., Islamabad, under the signature of Dr. Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio, Secretary<br />

(ST-L&P), addressed to Director General Procurement (Army), Ministry of Defence, Rawalpindi<br />

& copy to all Collectors of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Secretary (ST Education).]<br />

********<br />

C.No.3(1)STP/98 DATED 9 TH JANUARY, 2001<br />

SUBJECT:-<br />

PROPER INTERPRETATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF<br />

SECTION 9 OF THE SALES TAX ACT, 1990.<br />

I am directed to refer to your letters No.PO/CE/28/697, dated 31 st October, 2000<br />

and No.PO/CE/28/01765, DATED 16 th November, 2000 on the subject cited above and<br />

to inform that SRO 696 (I)/96 dated 22 nd August, 1996 clearly mentions that if the goods<br />

supplied are returned by the buyer within 90 days of the supply on the ground that the<br />

goods were damaged or of sub-standard quality, the buyer shall issue Debit Note and<br />

supplier shall issue Credit Note and shall make such adjustments in the record as are<br />

prescribed. There is no provision in the said rules for issuance of Debit and Credit Note<br />

in case of change in value of supplies due to quality claims, weight, disputes etc. This has<br />

already been clarified in para-2 in Board‘s letter of even number dated 8 th January, 1999<br />

(copy enclosed). However, in case of ginned cotton the Special Procedure for Ginning<br />

Industry Rules, 1996 already allows a period of six (06) days for settlement of terms, if<br />

any, about quantity and value. Board is of the view that this period should suffice to settle<br />

the disputes of price or quantity between buyer and seller.<br />

2. It is, therefore, reiterated that the scope of SRO 696(I)/96 dated 22 nd<br />

August, 1996 cannot be extended beyond the parameters envisaged therein.<br />

[Issued by the CBR, Islamabad under the signature of Dr. Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio,<br />

Secretary (ST-L&P), addressed to M/s All Pakistan Textile Mills Association, Karachi. Copy<br />

endorsed to all the Collectors of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> and Secretary (ST.Education).]<br />

********<br />

C. NO.3/(54) STP/99 DATED 11 TH JANUARY, 2001<br />

SUBJECT:-<br />

ORDER DATED 27.10.2000 OF APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,<br />

KARACHI BENCH, KARACHI IN THE CASE OF M/S.<br />

NOVARTIS (PAKISTAN) LTD.<br />

I am directed to refer to enclose a copy of order dated 27.10.2000 of the<br />

Appellate Tribunal Karachi Bench, Karachi in the case M/s Novartis (Pakistan) Ltd., (S.T<br />

Appeal No. K-193/2000) which has been applied to five other cases, and to say that the<br />

Appellate Tribunal has based its decision on an uncirculated U.O. Note of the Ministry of<br />

Law and on an order of the Indian Supreme Court. It is, therefore, requested that an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!