06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

3. The Collectorates are, therefore, directed that while conducting audit of<br />

the exporters, due consideration should be given to the said decision of the Government<br />

i.e. for exports made upto 30 th June, 1998 a counts variation of ±4 may be ignored, while<br />

for exports made thereafter, counts variation of ±3 maybe forgone. The contravention<br />

cases whether lying with the adjudication officers or are still being finalized in the<br />

Collectorates may also be reviewed accordingly. This position may be brought to the<br />

knowledge of adjudicating officers and/or appellate forums where needed.<br />

[Issued by the CBR, Islamabad under the signature of Dr. Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio,<br />

Secretary (ST L&P) addressed to all the Collectors of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong>. Copy endorsed to all the<br />

Collectors of Adjudication(<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong>).]<br />

********<br />

SALES TAX GENERAL ORDER NO.1/2001 DATED 26 TH MAY, 2001<br />

SUBJECT:-<br />

INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 66 OF THE SALES TAX ACT,<br />

1990.<br />

A question has been raised that when section 66 of the sales tax Act 1990<br />

disallows refund of tax claimed to have been paid or overpaid due to inadvertence error<br />

or misconception unless the claim is made within one year of the date of payment what<br />

would be the fate of such refund claims as have accrued in consequence of the decisions<br />

made by the appellate fora but where the time limitation of one year prescribed under the<br />

said section 66 has expired.<br />

2. On consultation by the Board, Law Justice & Human Rights Division has<br />

clarified and advised that the period of claming refund under section 66 of the sales tax<br />

Act 1990 is not applicable in matters pending with the judicial or quasi – judicial fora. In<br />

any particular case where the issue has been taken to a competent statutory forum for<br />

adjudication the decision of such Court or Tribunal has to be honoured irrespective of the<br />

period consumed in such litigation or any delay in the execution of such decision.<br />

3. The Collectorates are directed to finalize all such refund claims<br />

accordingly.<br />

[Rescinded vide STGO No.3 of 2004 dated 12 th June, 2004]<br />

[Issued by the CBR, Islamabad under the signature of Dr. Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio,<br />

Secretary (ST I&P) vide C.No.2(3)STP/99(Pt-1) addressed to all the Collectors of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong>.]<br />

********<br />

C.No.3(13)STP/96 DATED 28 TH MAY, 2001<br />

SUBJECT:-<br />

SALES TAX REFUND CLAIM – MEMO.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!