06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

of 50% of its production in first ten years or attains a minimum value addition of 40%<br />

while making taxable supplies made from imported plant/machinery.<br />

2. In order to resolve the disputes arising out of the aforesaid notification, a<br />

scheme was later announced by the Government whereby the importers who made<br />

imports under SRO 27(I)/98 were given an option to pay customs duty @ 1% per year of<br />

default, upto a maximum of 5%, with a commitment that payment of customs duty on<br />

these lines will be considered as full & final discharge of the entire liability. Accordingly,<br />

customs SRO 455(I)/2004 dated 12.06.2004 was issued.<br />

3. Since, SRO 455(I)/04 did not cover/embed section 13 of the <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong><br />

Act, 1990, therefore, on the advice of Law and Justice Division, another sales tax<br />

notification SRO 501(I)/2006 dated 31.05.2006 was issued, whereby sales tax exemption<br />

on plant, machinery and equipment imported under SRO 27(I)/98 was granted to all those<br />

manufacturers who had failed to comply with the conditions of SRO 27(I)/98 and had<br />

paid customs duty at concessionary rate under SRO 455(I)/04.<br />

4. The Law and Justice Division also advised that all the sales tax demands<br />

raised on account of failure to fulfill the condition laid down in notification SRO 27(I)/98<br />

dated 17.01.1998 should be withdrawn, including the cases made out by different field<br />

formations demanding payment of sales tax on 40% value addition against local supplies<br />

and any amounts of sales tax recovered from such importers-cum-manufacturers in<br />

consequence of demands should be refunded.<br />

5. The Board is, therefore, pleased to direct that all the sales tax related<br />

contravention cases instituted on account of failure to fulfill the condition laid down in<br />

notification SRO 27(I)/98 dated 17.01.1998 should be withdrawn, including the cases<br />

made out by different field formations demanding payment of sales tax on 40% value<br />

addition against local supplies.<br />

6. This decision shall also apply to the cases where demands have been<br />

established through quasi-judicial orders. Any amount of sales tax recovered from such<br />

importers-cum-manufacturers in consequence of the demands raised by the department<br />

shall be refunded to them subject to the condition that such amounts are verifiable,<br />

identifiable and relatable to such transactions and such payment had not already been<br />

adjusted by the registered person against his output tax liability.<br />

[Issued by the CBR, Islamabad, under the signature of Mr. Abdul Hameed Memon,<br />

Secretary (ST&FE-L&P) and copy endorsed to Secretary, Law and Justice Division with<br />

reference to Law, Justice and Human Rights Division‘s C. No. 1553/2005-Law(I) dated 7 th March,<br />

2006 and subsequent U.O. No. 1167/06 dated 15.05.2006, all Collectors of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> and Federal<br />

Excise & all Collectors of Customs<br />

********<br />

C.NO.3(1)STL&P/03 DATED 7 TH SEPTEMBER, 2006<br />

SUBJECT:<br />

RELEASE OF BANK GUARANTEE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!