06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

UNDER COERCION ON ACCOUNT OF CHILLING CHARGES<br />

I am directed to refer to the above cited above and to say that the beverage<br />

manufacturers have approached the Board that the Collectorates have refused to entertain<br />

the refund claims filed by them under section 66 of the <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1990 on the<br />

grounds that the incidence of excise duty and sales tax paid by them on account of<br />

chilling charges has been passed on to the consumers. Hence, refund is not admissible in<br />

terms of section 3D of the Central Excises Act, 1944 read with section 3B of the <strong>Sales</strong><br />

<strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1990.<br />

2. The issue has been examined in the Board. Since, all the beverage<br />

manufacturers are corporate sector companies registered under the <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1990, it<br />

is advised that the principal laid down by the appellate Tribunal and finally held up by the<br />

Supreme Court in SCMR-1266 in case of sugar mills should be treated as the instrument<br />

to determine whether or not the incidence of excise duty and sales tax has been passed on<br />

to the consumers. According to the said principal, if the price of a product has remained<br />

unchanged during the period of coercive charge of tax / duty as compared to the price<br />

determined and received by the taxpayer prior to that period, it then stands proved that<br />

incidence has not been passed on to the consumers.<br />

3. Accordingly the refund claims filed by the beverage manufacturers on<br />

account of chilling charges shall be processed by comparing the sales tax invoices of the<br />

disputed product with their earlier invoices of the same item. If sales tax invoices of the<br />

disputed goods are equal in terms of sale price as compared to the previous invoices,<br />

refund shall be allowed.<br />

[Issued by the Government of Pakistan, (Revenue Division), Central Board of Revenue,<br />

[<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Wing], under the signature of Mr. Aamer Amin Bhatti, Secretary (ST-L&P), addressed<br />

to the Collector, Collectorate of Customs, <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> & Central Excise, Hyderabad/ Quetta/<br />

Multan, the Collector, Collectorate of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> & Central Excise, Lahore/ Faisalabad/<br />

Gujranwala/ Rawalpindi/ Peshawar, the Collector, Enforcement/ Headquarters/ Audit, <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong><br />

House, Karachi and the Collector, Large <strong>Tax</strong>payers Unit, Karachi.. Copy to the Chief (Central<br />

Excise), Central Board of Revenue, Islamabad for information, Mr. Muhammad Ali, M/s.<br />

Commerce & Revenue Consultants, 510, ST.No.9, Sector F-10/2, Islamabad, with reference to his<br />

letter No. Nil dated 20.10.2003 and the Joint Director, Computer for hosting of WEB.]<br />

********<br />

C. NO. 1(6)STR/2004 DATED 25 TH AUGUST, 2004<br />

SUBJECT<br />

IMPOSITION OF CED IN VAT MODE ON SHIPPING AGNETS<br />

I am directed to refer to your letter / fax Ref. No.PSAA/157 dated 12.08.2004 on<br />

the subject cited above and to clarify that if a Slot Carrier in not issuing ―House Bill of<br />

Lading‖ or collecting freight, the provisions of amendment made vide SRO 621(I)/2004<br />

dated 17 th July, 2004 should not apply and he is required to charge, collect and pay<br />

central excise duty at the standard rate of 15% of the commission received by him.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!