06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

Period<br />

(i) 1 st July 2004 to 30 th June 2005<br />

Minimum Net Payment<br />

At Re.0.75 per kg of items imported<br />

as in column (3) of the Table in SRO<br />

24(I)/2006<br />

At Re.1.00 per kg of items imported<br />

as aforesaid.<br />

(i) 1 st July 2005 to 31 st December<br />

2005<br />

4. An indicative statement of imports by such manufacturer and the amount<br />

payable by them as per criteria above is enclosed. However, the Collectors may examine<br />

the same for any omissions and inaccuracies. In case the actual amount paid is less than<br />

the one worked out as per criteria above, the differential amount may be recovered by<br />

30 th June, 2006. It is further clarified that this arrangement will not entitle any<br />

manufacture to claim refund of any amount paid earlier.<br />

5. Progress report may be sent to the Board by 5 th July, 2006.<br />

[Issued by CBR., Islamabad, under the signature of Mr. Abdul Hameed Memon,<br />

Secretary (ST&FE-L&P), addressed to the Collector, <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> & Federal Excise, Peshawar/<br />

Rawalpindi/ Faisalabad / Gujranwala / Lahore/ (Hqrs.)/ (Audit)/ (Enforcement), <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> House,<br />

Karachi, the Collector, Customs, ST & FE, Multan / Hyderabad/ Quetta and the Collector, Large<br />

<strong>Tax</strong>payers Unit, Karachi (Audit)/ (Enforcement), Lahore. Copy to the Secretary, Pakistan<br />

Vanaspati Manufacturers‘ Association, Islamabad, with the request to circulate the decision to its<br />

members and ensure payment of dues by the 30the June, 2006.]<br />

********<br />

C. NO. 3(17)ST-L&P/2001 DATED 24 TH , JUNE, 2006<br />

SUBJECT:- CLARIFICATION REGARDING PROCESSING OF REFUND<br />

CLAIMS UNDER THE STARR AND DATABASE RISK<br />

ANALYSIS<br />

I am directed to refer to your letter C.No.IV-10/R A-M/CBR/ST/03/P-II/762<br />

dated 06-06-2006 on the subject noted above.<br />

2. The points raised in the letter under reference appear to have emanated<br />

due to lack of proper understanding of the Risk-based Analysis System. For instance no<br />

analysis of GDs is required provided the same are cleared by the repository system.<br />

Similarly, the refund against utility bills is paid through Utility Counter and as such Fast<br />

Track Channel does not entertain the same. The multiple returns could be filed only for<br />

the reasons specified in the law and as such it could only be seen through manual scrutiny<br />

that the revised return has been filed for genuine reasons. PTCL bills and courier invoices<br />

are only entertained if these have been nexus with exported / zero-rated goods, which<br />

needs manual scrutiny. The risk parameters are not required to be known to the<br />

Collectorate‘s processing staff of the refund claims and anybody not cleared by RPC is<br />

required to be put to detailed scrutiny. It is also clarified that RPC does not overrule any<br />

of the STARR objections. In view of the position stated above, the Collector may depute

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!