06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

―Revised‖ only, the Collectorate was of the view that their case was not fit for exemption<br />

under SRO 395(I)/2001. While their case was under rejection, the owner of the unit made<br />

a representation to the Collectorate against the intended rejection on the following<br />

grounds:-<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

They had not violated the rule 1(a) of SRO 395(I)/2001 as they had not<br />

been registered with the <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Department since 11.8.1993 as<br />

contended by the Collectorate. In fact they were paying fixed sales tax<br />

since 1993 and the department had allotted some sort of computer<br />

number to them for statistical purposes.<br />

Their actually proper registration with <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Department took place<br />

after February, 2002 when they applied for it. Now registration number<br />

could not be allotted to them in February, 2000, because registration<br />

number given by the department on its own already existed in the<br />

computer and the same could not be deleted.<br />

3. The Collector, <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> & Central Excise (West), Karachi, has<br />

proposed that M/s. Ecko Textile (Pvt.) Limited, Karachi, may be granted exemption in<br />

terms of SRO 395(I)/2001 in relaxation of rule 1(a) thereof, it is requested that the subject<br />

issues may be examined in each Collectorate thoroughly and the following information<br />

may be communicated to the Board:-<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

The number of cases of such nature filed in the Collectorate and pending<br />

for disposal/ rejected by the Collectorate being already registered.<br />

Implications of relaxing condition 1(a) of SRO 395(I)/2001 on the cases<br />

filed under SRO 392(I)/2001 and pending for disposal /already rejected<br />

by the Collectorate due to double registration or being non-filers for<br />

more than four months‘ period (the condition of SRO 395(I)/2001).<br />

[Issued by the C. B. R., Islamabad, under the signature of Mr. Manzoor Hussain Memon,<br />

Secretary (ST-L&P), addressed to the Collector, <strong>Sales</strong> tax & Central Excise, Peshawar, Lahore,<br />

Rawalpindi, Hyderabad (East), Karachi, the Collector, Customs, <strong>Sales</strong> tax & Central Excise,<br />

Hyderabad, Multan, Quetta and the Collector, Collectorate of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong>, Faisalabad.]<br />

********<br />

SALES TAX GENERAL ORDER NO.1/2002.<br />

C.No.3(12)ST-L&P/2002 DATED 31 TH AUGUST, 2002<br />

SUBJECT:-<br />

CLARIFICATION REGARDING REFUND RULES, 2000 ISSUED<br />

VIDE NOTIFICATION NO.SRO 417(I)/2000, DATED 20.06.2000.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!