06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

[Issued by the CBR, Islamabad under the signature of Dr. Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio,<br />

Secretary (ST-L&P), addressed to M/s All Pakistan Textile Mills Association, Karachi. Copy<br />

endorsed to all the Collectors of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> and Secretary (ST.Education).]<br />

********<br />

C. NO.3/(54) STP/99 DATED 11 TH JANUARY, 2001<br />

SUBJECT:-<br />

ORDER DATED 27.10.2000 OF APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,<br />

KARACHI BENCH, KARACHI IN THE CASE OF M/S.<br />

NOVARTIS (PAKISTAN) LTD.<br />

I am directed to refer to enclose a copy of order dated 27.10.2000 of the<br />

Appellate Tribunal Karachi Bench, Karachi in the case M/s Novartis (Pakistan) Ltd., (S.T<br />

Appeal No. K-193/2000) which has been applied to five other cases, and to say that the<br />

Appellate Tribunal has based its decision on an uncirculated U.O. Note of the Ministry of<br />

Law and on an order of the Indian Supreme Court. It is, therefore, requested that an<br />

appeal against the above order may be filed at the earliest on, inter alia, the following<br />

points:-<br />

The Board having strong reservations against Law Division‘s ruling has already<br />

sent reference for review of the decision on a number of grounds (copy<br />

enclosed). The law Division has fixed a date during this month for discussion on<br />

the issue. These grounds may be cited in the appeal: and<br />

The decision of Indian Supreme Court is neither relevant to the case in question,<br />

nor binding on any Court in Pakistan.<br />

[Issued by CBR., Islamabad, under the signature of Dr. Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio, Secretary<br />

(ST-L&P), addressed to the Collector, Collectorate of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> & Central Excise (West),<br />

Karachi].<br />

********<br />

C. NO.4/(57)-STB/97-VOL-III DATED 11 TH JANUARY, 2001<br />

SUBJECT:- SALES TAX ON SUGAR—1999-2000.<br />

I am directed to refer to your letter No. PSMA/A-8/2001/003, dated 01.01.2001<br />

on the above subject and to say that the contents of the application have been examined.<br />

SRO 208(I)/98, dated 31.3.1998, exempted such amount of sales tax on sugar as was in<br />

excess of tax leviable at the assessable value notified by the CBR under its Notification<br />

SRO 207(I)/98, dated 31.3.1998. SRO 751(I)/2000, dated 21.10.2000 amended SRO<br />

207(I)/98 and the value of the taxable supply of locally produced sugar was fixed upto<br />

October, 2000. The adjudicating officer has accepted the revalidation/ extension of the<br />

benefit available to sugar mills vide SRO 751(I)/2000.<br />

2. As far as further tax is concerned which is leviable under sub-clause (1A)<br />

of section 3 of the <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Act, supplies made to un-registered persons are subject to<br />

further tax (prior to Finance Ordinance, 2000 rate of further tax was 3 %) at the rate of<br />

1.5 % of the value and it remains unaffected by SROs 207(I)/98 & 208(I)/98. These

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!