06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

[Issued by the CBR, Islamabad under the signature of Dr. Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio,<br />

Secretary (ST-L&P) addressed to M/s Muhammad Amin Muhammad Moqeem Clearing and<br />

Forwarding Agents, Karachi. Copy endorsed to all the Collectors of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong>.]<br />

********<br />

C. NO. 2(65)STP/95 DATED 22 ND SEPTEMBER, 2001<br />

SUBJECT:- CLARIFICATION REGARDING DISTRIBUTION OF<br />

COSMETICS MANUFACTURED IN MINGORA<br />

I am directed to refer your letter C.No.8-ST/Audit & Rec/Forvil/2001/2241,<br />

dated 15.08.2001 on the subject cited above and to say that in compliance of the order<br />

dated 24.7.2001 of the Federal <strong>Tax</strong> Ombudsman in compliant No.829/2001 the issue has<br />

been examined in the Board. It is observed that the Collectorate‘s action is based on to<br />

premise that M/s. Forvil Cosmetics, though manufacturing goods in non-tariff area of<br />

FATA are required to be registered as wholesaler in Lahore under section 2(47) of the<br />

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1990 on the ground that they have been making supplies from Lahore. On<br />

the other hand, the complainant claims that the said Lahore office was merely a liaison<br />

office and no supply of goods was being made there from, its purpose being to have a<br />

place for meetings, arranging publicity, making purchases of raw materials, monitoring<br />

the market and responding to complaints about defective goods, etc.<br />

2. The controversy thus involves legal as well as factual dimensions. As<br />

regard the factual aspects, the question of charging of tax on goods manufactured in nontariff<br />

area is already a controversial one involving legal and constitutional considerations<br />

the Peshawar High Court has already given some judgments against the department<br />

against which appeals are pending in the Supreme Court. However, CBR has been<br />

clarified that the provisions of the <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1990 have not been extended to<br />

FATA/PATA, persons making supplies of taxable goods manufactured in FATA / PATA<br />

in tariff areas are required to be registered and pay tax on such supplies. This means that<br />

a manufacturer located in FATA/PATA, who is not making taxable supplies in tariff area<br />

but is exclusively selling his goods to buyers in non-tariff area, is not liable to be<br />

registered or pay sales tax on such supplies as liability to tax arises only when taxable<br />

goods are supplied in tariff area.<br />

3. There is no provision under the <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1990 to restrict any<br />

person having his manufacturing premises in non-tariff area from maintaining an office in<br />

tariff-area, and tax liability will arise only if taxable supplies are made from such office.<br />

In a similar case of M/s. Siddiqsons Tin Plate Limited, Board issued ruling vide C.<br />

No.3(5)STP/99, dated 2.5.2001 that a person having manufacturing premises in exempt<br />

area and maintaining an office and ware house in Karachi, was not required to be<br />

registered.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!