06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

& Federal Excise, Hyderabad / Quetta/Multan, the Collector of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> and Federal Excise,<br />

LTU, Karachi / Lahore.]<br />

********<br />

C. NO.1/22-STB/2002 DATED 26 TH JULY, 2005<br />

SUBJECT:<br />

CAPPING OF INPUT TAX ON CHEMICAL.<br />

I am direct to refer to the subject cited above and to state that for the sales tax<br />

refund purpose, the Board is pleased to provisionally allow 1% of FOB value for<br />

chemical as the maximum capping concerning refund on chemicals used in leather<br />

finishing, w.e.f 06.06.2005. However, input of chemicals purchased prior to 06.06.2005<br />

shall be refunded @ 4% FOB as determined by the IOCO.<br />

[Issued by the CBR., Islamabad, under the signature of Dr. Iftikhar Ahmed, Secretary<br />

(STT), addressed to the Collector, Customs, <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> & Central Excise, Hyderabad /Quetta/<br />

Multan, the Collector, Collectorate of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> & Central Excise, Lahore/ Faisalabad/<br />

Gujranwala/ Rawalpindi/ Peshawar, the Collector (Enforcement) / (Hdqrs)/ (Audit), <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong><br />

House, Karachi, the Collector, Large taxpayer Unit (LTU), Karachi / Lahore.]<br />

********<br />

C. NO.4(18)STM/2003 DATED 28 Th JULY, 2005<br />

SUBJECT:<br />

SALES TAX AMNESTY UNDER SRO 520(I)/2005 DATE<br />

06.06.2005-M/S MEDORA OF LONDON & GENERAL<br />

COSMETICS (PVT) LTD.<br />

I am directed to refer to Collector <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> & Central Excise, Lahore letter C.<br />

No. Audit-V/ST&CE/342/03/823 dated 26.06.2005 on the subject cited above and to say<br />

that the Board has examined the matter and observed that the present case involves both<br />

factual and legal matters. Firstly, whether the collectorate has sufficient evidence to prove<br />

that the resumption of record, on the premise of which the whole case in based, was made<br />

correctly, speak of the legal infirmities and shortcoming to this effect. In case the short of<br />

legal evidence before the Supreme Court as well, the whole exercise is likely to end in<br />

vain.<br />

2. Secondly, whether there is sufficient evidence that the action were<br />

deliberate. Section 36(1) empower the department to issue a show cause notice within 5<br />

years of recovery of an amount where it was not levied or erroneously refunded by reason<br />

of some collision and deliberate act, while section 36(2) empower the department to issue<br />

show cause notice within 3 years where the tax was not levied, short levied or<br />

erroneously refunded due to inadvertence, error or misconstruction. The Collectorate has<br />

not indicated that there was any collusion involved, neither pointed out the officials or<br />

person with whom the taxpayers colluded to evade tax, whether it is deliberate act is a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!