06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

originating from the registered person, is not a sales tax document is not correct.<br />

Notwithstanding that the tax invoice is prepared and issued by a registered person yet it is<br />

in every respect a sales tax document. Any attestation or otherwise of the sales tax<br />

document is obligation of the department under section 69 of the Act. Moreover in case<br />

the authentication of tax invoice is disallowed, as proposed by the Collector, there would<br />

be no method available for getting the refund claims in case the documents are genuinely<br />

lost. In this connection it is observed that practical situation do arise when the invoice is<br />

misplaced due to some genuine circumstances. Such requests are not very frequent and<br />

should not be stopped as such a decision would unnecessarily create problems for the<br />

taxpayers. However, the Board may direct the Collectorates that:-<br />

duplicate or certified invoices may be issued only after the lodging of FIR by the<br />

applicant for such loss (as in the case of bill of entry/shipping bill);<br />

filing of formal application alongwith the payment of required fees in the treasury;<br />

thorough and proper checking from the records maintained by the taxpayers; and<br />

proper records of all such certifications and attestation should be maintained in the<br />

Collectorate; so that misuse, if any, could be minimized.<br />

4. Member (<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong>) has desired that the officers of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Wing may<br />

consider this problem jointly and arrive at a consensus. You are, therefore, requested to<br />

kindly consider the matter and firm up your views to be discussed in the meeting in this<br />

regard to be held soon.<br />

[Issued by the CBR, Islamabad under the signature of Dr.Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio, Secretary<br />

(ST-L&P) addressed to the S(ST Monitoring & Investigation), S(ST Audit), S(ST Budget & Chief<br />

Services) and S(STJ), CBR, Islamabad. Copy endorsed to PS to Member (ST), Chief (ST-I) and<br />

(ST-II) for information.]<br />

********<br />

U. O. NO.3(13)STP/96(Pt.) DATED 17 TH NOVEMBER, 2000<br />

SUBJECT:-<br />

DIRECTIVES ISSUES BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF<br />

PAKISTAN DURING HIS VISIT TO LAHORE ON 23.09.2000.<br />

The undersigned is directed to refer to Office Memorandum No.3(2)/2000.<br />

Exp.III, dated 23.10.2000 of Ministry of Commerce on the subject cited above and to<br />

state that representation of M/s. Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt.)Ltd., was sent to<br />

the Collector, <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> & CE (East) Karachi who has reported that Ms. Trading<br />

Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt.)Ltd., has so far filed refund claims for an amount of Rs.520<br />

million. The scrutiny of their claim documents by the Collectorate has revealed the<br />

following discrepancies:-<br />

(i) The shipping bills submitted for the refund claims do not bear the stamp<br />

of ―shipped in full‖ required for indicating the MATE Receipt number<br />

with date which is necessary for confirmation that goods had actually<br />

been received by master of the vessel and exported out of Pakistan.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!