06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

get registered under the normal invoice-based GST system in VAT-mode in case<br />

their total annual turnover is Rs.25 Lac or more.<br />

3. Kindly note that even persons entitled to turnover tax scheme, under<br />

section 3A of the <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1990, as mentioned in paragraph 2(i) above, may elect<br />

(at their own discretion) to pay sales tax at standard rate with input tax credit / adjustment<br />

scheme.<br />

4. However, it is reiterated that fixed tax schemes or special sales tax<br />

procedures (in lieu of the turnover tax or in lieu of the normal sales tax system) is not<br />

possible.<br />

[Issued by the CBR Islamabad, under the signature of Mr.Muhammad Ishaque, For<br />

Secretary (Retail <strong>Tax</strong>), being addressed to Mr.Mahmood Ghuman, President, Furniture Makers<br />

Association, Railway Road, Gujrat,]<br />

********<br />

C. NO.1(16)GST/COMP/98 DATED 2 ND AUGUST, 1999<br />

SUBJECT:-<br />

SANCTIONING OF ADMISSIBLE REFUNDS<br />

Enclosed please find a statement showing Collectorate-wise refund pendency<br />

status as on 30.06.1999 (Annex-I). The pendency figures are simply alarming. Time and<br />

against, Board has advised you to sanction the due, bona-fide, genuine and admissible<br />

refund claims on merits. As regards the claims pending for want for verification of tax<br />

invoice and tax payments, the Board had advised that all Collectorates, specially<br />

Hyderabad, Multan, Faisalabad, Lahore and Gujranwala, should constitute Special<br />

Verification Teams, totally dedicated to this task, to ensure factual verification on merits<br />

within a week‘s time from the date a reference is received in this regard.<br />

2. Board expects that while signing these statements to be sent to CBR, the<br />

respective Collector should take an account of the efficiency and effectiveness in his<br />

Collectorate in this regard. Refund claims pending for more than 90 days should cause<br />

ALARM and Collector should personally satisfy that the reasons for pendency are<br />

genuine and un-avoidable. Board feels that such claims, pending for more than 90 days<br />

due to claimants ‗fault‘ should be rejected after due process of law. Board also feels that<br />

Collectors should write to his counterpart (where verifications are pending) giving<br />

specific details of pendency. If verification report is not received within 30 days of the<br />

reference, let a report reach C. B. R.<br />

3. I once again request Collectors of Hyderabad, Multan, Faisalabad,<br />

Lahore and Gujranwala to constitute Invoice Verification Teams TODAY and dispose off<br />

all pendency of verification work on merits within 10 days of the receipt of this letter.<br />

4. I reiterate that all pending genuine, bonefide, due and admissible refund<br />

claims be sanctioned within 7 days in GOLD category, within 15 days in SILVER<br />

category and within 30 days in case of others, refunds should be withheld only in<br />

unavoidable cases e.g. of tax frauds or on-going investigations with specific permission<br />

of the Collector.<br />

********<br />

Coll<br />

ector<br />

Amount of refund export<br />

pending as on 30.06.99<br />

Amount of refund (other than<br />

export) as on 30-06-99<br />

Total amount of refunds<br />

pending as on 30.06.99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!