06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

SUBJECT:<br />

REFUND CLAIMS FILED BY M/S. TELENOR PAKISTAN<br />

I am directed to refer to the Collectorate‘s letter C.No.ST/R/04/146/2006/1830<br />

dated 06.12.2006 on the subject noted above.<br />

2. The matter pending to refund claim by M/s Telenor has been examined.<br />

It is observed that M/s Telenor have claimed refund in the revised returns for the period<br />

September, 2004 to June, 2005, instead of carrying forward of excess input tax. This<br />

procedural deviation has occurred because old return form, allowing carry forward of<br />

excess input tax, was not available on CBR‘s website. Accordingly, this minor deviation<br />

is condoned as the same will not affect the net refund claim. The Collectorate may,<br />

therefore, process the claim on merit and finalize the same, duly ensuring the legality and<br />

accuracy of input tax claimed in the revised returns.<br />

[Issued by the CBR, under the signature of Mr. Abdul Hameed Memon, Secretary,<br />

(ST&FE-L&P), addressed to the Collector, <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> & Federal Excise, Rawalpindi. Copy to M/s.<br />

Telenor Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd., Islamabad]<br />

********<br />

C. NO.2(1)ST-L&P/2000 (Pt) DATED 29 TH DECEMBER, 2006<br />

SUBJECT:<br />

CONDONATION OF TIME LIMIT FOR SUBMISSION OF<br />

REFUND CLAIMS<br />

I am directed to refer to the subject noted above.<br />

2. Rule 28 of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Rules, 2006 provides that no refund claim shall be<br />

entertained if the claimant fails to furnish the claim on RCPS along with the supportive<br />

documents within a period of sixty days of the filing of return. The Collectors have been<br />

empowered to extend this period by further thirty days under sub-rule (2) of the said rule.<br />

The objective of introducing this clause was to provide for a time limit for submission of<br />

these documents as previously no time limit for submitting the same was provided in the<br />

rules as a result, the claimants could provide such documents even after several years.<br />

3. Considering that the time limit prescribed under new refund rules,<br />

effective from 01.07.2006 had not been properly publicized and there was some<br />

confusion in the field about the applicability of the time limit of 60 days to claims<br />

relating to the period prior to July, 2006, CBR has allowed processing of such claims by<br />

31.12.2006. While granting permission to submit the supportive documents in respect of<br />

such claims CBR vide its letter of even numbers dated 25.11.2006, 28.11.2006 and<br />

30.11.2006 had made it abundantly clear that this is one-time extension. However, it has<br />

been observed that the Board is still receiving requests for extension even in respect of<br />

claims relating to the tax period July, August & September, 2006 about which there was<br />

no confusion or ambiguity as to the time limit for submitting the supportive documents.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!