06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

c) Whether a person who acted as chairman of the committee could issue a<br />

show cause notice in the case.<br />

2. The issues have been examined afresh. The queries at (b) and (c) are<br />

almost identical. The query at (a) has a different dimension. In continuation of Board‘s<br />

letter no. even dated 16.12.2008 (copy enclosed) the matter is addressed as follows:<br />

(a) Though there is no express provisions of modality of associating the registered<br />

person concerned during the process of valuation under valuation committee<br />

constituted in terms of 2(46), the principles of natural justice warrant that the<br />

person concerned be afforded reasonable opportunity of representing his point of<br />

view as the decision is likely to affect his interests . Accordingly, the Chairman<br />

of the committee may associate the registered person concerned to arrive at<br />

reasonable, objective valuation.<br />

(b) For fairness, impartiality and objectivity a person (a tax officer) who issues a<br />

show cause notice in the same case may not be member of the committee.<br />

[Issued by CBR., Islamabad, under the signature of Mr. Muhammad Sadiq, Secretary<br />

(ST-Law &Procedure) addressed to M/s. Diamond Group of Industries, 180, G-1, Johar Town,<br />

Lahore and copy endorsed to the Collector of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> and Federal Excise, RTO, Lahore.]<br />

********<br />

C. NO.3(12)ST-L&P/2008 DATED 22 ND JANUARY, 2009<br />

SUBJECT:<br />

CONDONING OF TIME LIMIT FOR SUBMISSION OF REFUND<br />

CLAIM UNDER SECTION 66 OF THE SALES TAX ACT, 1990<br />

BEYOND THE PRESCRIBED PERIOD<br />

I am directed to refer to your letter C. No. 06/Refund/G-I/M& F/2008/6707 dated<br />

12.01.2009 on the subject cited above and to say that the issue has been examined and the<br />

Board is pleased to advise that the following guideline for judicious exercise of the<br />

powers to condone delay under SRO 978 (I)/2004 may be followed:<br />

It is obvious that the SRO 978 (I)/2004 dated 10-12-2004 is effective from the<br />

date of its issuance. Hence the Collector is empowered to entertain on merit cases<br />

regarding condoning of delay occurring on or after 10.12.2004.<br />

[Issued by CBR., Islamabad, under the signature of Mr. Muhammad Sadiq, Secretary<br />

(ST&FE-L&P) addressed to the Collector (Enforcement), Collectorate of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> & Federal<br />

Excise, Karachi and copy endorsed to M/s. Meskay & Femtee (Pvt) LTd., 708, 7 th Floor,<br />

Progressive Plaza, Civil Lines, Karachi.]<br />

********<br />

C. NO.3(7)ST-L&P/2006 DATED 29 TH JANUARY, 2009<br />

SUBJECT:<br />

MOBILE HAWKING AND DOOR STEP CHARGES FOR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!