06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

machinery as are spares for use in or with such machinery and excluding maintenance<br />

spares for current use have been allowed exemption. M.S. plates, although may be used<br />

in making tanks of the refinery, cannot be termed as component parts of machinery,<br />

identifiable for use for or with machinery. Therefore, the viewpoint of the Collectorate in<br />

this regard is correct.<br />

[Issued by the C. B. R., Islamabad, under the signature of Dr. Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio,<br />

Secretary (ST-L&P), addressed to the Collector, <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Central Excise, (East)Karachi/ & copy<br />

to Collector of <strong>Sales</strong> tax & Central Excise, Peshawar, Rawalpindi, Gujranwala, (East)Karachi,<br />

(Wes)Karachi, Lahore, Hyderabad, Quetta, Faisalabad, Multan.]<br />

********<br />

C. NO. 1/6-STT/2001 DATED 28 TH NOVEMBER, 2001<br />

SUBJECT:- IMPOSITION OF SALES TAX ON SPECTRABAN ULTRA 28<br />

I am directed to refer to your letter dated 6th November, 2001, on the subject<br />

cited above and to say that Board has already ruled vide letter of even number dated 18.8<br />

2001 that ‗Spectra ban Ultra‘ (PCT-3304.9910) sunscreen is not exempt from sales tax.<br />

The item has been chargeable to sales tax w.e.f. 16.08.1999 (copy of Board‘s letter of<br />

even number dated 21.11.2001 enclosed). You are therefore advised to pay sales tax on<br />

all supplies of this product accordingly.<br />

[Issued by the C. B. R., Islamabad, under the signature of Dr. Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio,<br />

Secretary (ST-L&P), being addressed to M/s.Stiefel Laboratories Pakistan (Pvt,.)Ltd., 2K-1,<br />

Model Town, Karachi.]<br />

********<br />

C. NO. 3(65)STP/97 (VOL-1) DATED 5 TH DECEMBER, 2001<br />

SUBJECT:-<br />

PENDING REFUND OF INPUT TAX PAID ON YARN<br />

I am directed to refer to your letter C. No.Coll.Off/Misc/2001/2342, dated 31 st<br />

May, 2001, on the above subject and to say that the Collector‘s view that the principle of<br />

continuous chain tax invoices was introduced only with SRO 417(I)/2000, dated<br />

20.06.2000 is correct.<br />

2. Since the case of the football manufactures pertain to the period prior to<br />

SRO 417(I)/2000, equity demands that the same treatment be given to football<br />

manufacturers who purchased yarn and got lining fabric woven from their parties, as was<br />

being given to other exporters at the time. The Collector may therefore, process such<br />

refund cases merits. However, if any cases have been rejected through orders-in-original,<br />

the concerned parties may go in appeal against such orders.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!