06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

‗supply of goods‘ within the meaning of sub-section (33) of section 2 of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Act,<br />

1990 and thus attracts sales tax.<br />

2. On consultation with the Law and Justice Division, Board has observed<br />

that leasing companies are non-banking financial institutions which, inter-alia, provide<br />

funds for acquisition of foreign or local machinery to registered persons (taxpayers). The<br />

invoices or bills of entry of such machinery are usually in the name of such registered<br />

taxpayers but on acquiring the machinery, they enter into ―sale and lease-back<br />

agreements‖ with the leasing companies. During the currency of such agreements, the<br />

title of the machinery remains with the leasing companies, though it simultaneously<br />

remains installed in the factory for use by such registered persons. The machinery is deleased<br />

on repayment of loan as per agreed terms and conditions.<br />

3. The transactions called the ―financial lease‖ have been specifically<br />

excluded from the definition of the term ―supply‖ through the Finance Ordinance, 2000.<br />

―<strong>Sales</strong> and lease-back‖ transaction is a mode of securing the amount of loan by the nonbanking<br />

financial institutions. Since in such a transaction where there is neither any<br />

intention to actually sell the machinery or transfer its title or possession, nor such<br />

financial institutions need the machinery, and the real intention of the transaction is<br />

merely a ‗disguised security‘ against a lease contract, such transactions essentially fall in<br />

the category of ―financial services‖ which do not attract sales tax.<br />

4. It is therefore, clarified that sales tax is not chargeable on such<br />

transactions.<br />

[Issued by the CBR, Islamabad under the signature of Dr. Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio,<br />

Secretary (ST-L&P) addressed to all the Collectors of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong>.]<br />

********<br />

C.No.1(33)STP/93 DATED 26 TH FEBRUARY, 2001<br />

SUBJECT:- NON-COMPOUNDING OF ADDITIONAL TAX UNDER<br />

SECTION 34 – CLARIFICATION REGARDING.<br />

I am directed to refer to section 7 of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> (Amendment) Ordinance, 2001<br />

(VII of 2001) where under an explanation has been added to section 34 of the <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong><br />

Act, 1990 to the effect that for the purpose of the said section ―tax due‖ does not include<br />

the amount of penalty. It may be re-called that in the Finance Ordinance, 2000 not only<br />

the rate of additional tax was reduced from 5% to 1.5% of the tax due per month or any<br />

part thereof but also the rate was made simple (non-compound) by omitting the then<br />

existing explanation which included additional tax in the expression ―tax due‖ for the<br />

purpose of section 34.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!