06.03.2018 Views

Sales Tax Instructions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> <strong>Instructions</strong>, 2009<br />

tax not claimed in that return may be filed under section 66 of the <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1990,<br />

and will be dealt with by the Collectorate on merit.<br />

[Issued by CBR., Islamabad, under the signature of Dr. Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio, Secretary<br />

(ST-L&P), addressed to Mr. Babar Bashir Nawaz, Chief Operating Officer, Attock cement<br />

Pakistan Ltd., PNSC Building M.T. Khan Road, Karachi & copy to all the Collectors of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong>]<br />

********<br />

C. NO.4/(47) STP/98(Pt-II) DATED 3 RD JANUARY, 2001<br />

SUBJECT:-<br />

IMPOSITION OF SALES TAX- COTTON SEED OIL (ANIMAL<br />

RATION).<br />

The undersigned is directed to refer to Directorate General Procurement (Army),<br />

Ministry of Defence‘s Case No. 23-0278-2-0, dated 06.12.2000 on the subject noted<br />

above and to state that vide S. No. 53 of the Sixth Schedule to the <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Act, 1990<br />

cattle feed falling under PCT Headings No. 2302.1000, 2306.1000, 2306.7000 and<br />

2309.9000 is exempt from sales tax. This includes oil cakes of cotton seed and of maize<br />

(corn) gram used as cattle feed.<br />

[Issued by CBR., Islamabad, under the signature of Dr. Ashfaq Ahmed Tunio, Secretary<br />

(ST-L&P), addressed to Director General Procurement (Army), Ministry of Defence, Rawalpindi<br />

& copy to all Collectors of <strong>Sales</strong> <strong>Tax</strong> Secretary (ST Education).]<br />

********<br />

C.No.3(1)STP/98 DATED 9 TH JANUARY, 2001<br />

SUBJECT:-<br />

PROPER INTERPRETATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF<br />

SECTION 9 OF THE SALES TAX ACT, 1990.<br />

I am directed to refer to your letters No.PO/CE/28/697, dated 31 st October, 2000<br />

and No.PO/CE/28/01765, DATED 16 th November, 2000 on the subject cited above and<br />

to inform that SRO 696 (I)/96 dated 22 nd August, 1996 clearly mentions that if the goods<br />

supplied are returned by the buyer within 90 days of the supply on the ground that the<br />

goods were damaged or of sub-standard quality, the buyer shall issue Debit Note and<br />

supplier shall issue Credit Note and shall make such adjustments in the record as are<br />

prescribed. There is no provision in the said rules for issuance of Debit and Credit Note<br />

in case of change in value of supplies due to quality claims, weight, disputes etc. This has<br />

already been clarified in para-2 in Board‘s letter of even number dated 8 th January, 1999<br />

(copy enclosed). However, in case of ginned cotton the Special Procedure for Ginning<br />

Industry Rules, 1996 already allows a period of six (06) days for settlement of terms, if<br />

any, about quantity and value. Board is of the view that this period should suffice to settle<br />

the disputes of price or quantity between buyer and seller.<br />

2. It is, therefore, reiterated that the scope of SRO 696(I)/96 dated 22 nd<br />

August, 1996 cannot be extended beyond the parameters envisaged therein.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!