31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

4.282 In the Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation we examined results of surveys, both<br />

commissioned by <strong>Ofcom</strong> and supplied to us by stakeholders on consumers’<br />

preferences for premium movie packages. Surveys such as these can help identify<br />

which products might be relatively close substitutes for premium movie channels. We<br />

found that Sky Movies subscribers particularly valued access to a large quantity of<br />

recent films in their film packages.<br />

4.283 For example one of our own surveys revealed that a significant proportion of pricesensitive<br />

movie subscribers considered access to a range of films (81%), films on at<br />

all times (70%) and access to new movies (68%), as either ‘nice to have’ or ‘must<br />

have’ features of their package 216 . This suggests that older library movies (or nonmovie<br />

content) found on FTA or basic-tier <strong>TV</strong> are likely to be a less good substitute<br />

for the consumers who value access to new movies. We also found that 57% of<br />

price-sensitive subscribers consider the ability to pay monthly a useful feature of their<br />

package 217 .<br />

4.284 A survey carried out for Virgin Media asked consumers which genre of content they<br />

would consider paying more than their current subscription. ‘New’ movies was the<br />

most popular movie genre for both Virgin Media and Sky subscribers (cited by [ �<br />

]% and [ � ]% of subscribers on each platform). This was significantly above ‘classic<br />

movies’, cited by only [ � ]% of subscribers on both cable and Sky 218 .<br />

4.285 Internal research supplied to us by Sky 219 , (used when considering how to package<br />

its movie channels), noted that although consumers were often not aware of the<br />

windowing of films, the “key is premieres … all international [movie channel] offerings<br />

have a channel offering the most recent titles”.<br />

Responses to our consultation<br />

4.286 Sky agreed with <strong>Ofcom</strong> that it was “axiomatic” that consumers value a given film<br />

more the closer it is to release 220 . Sky commented that film windows had changed<br />

citing for example:<br />

“the period between a film’s theatrical release and its home video<br />

release has halved from around 6 months to 3 months making DVDs<br />

more attractive to consumers.<br />

The period between home video and PPV release has fallen even<br />

more dramatically: the typical period is now 45 days … whereas in<br />

2000 it was 160 to 180 days. “<br />

4.287 Sky notes that as the PPV window moves closer to the theatrical release it is likely to<br />

become more attractive relative to Sky Movies.<br />

216<br />

Full details of the analysis of preferences are found in <strong>Ofcom</strong>’s Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation,<br />

Annex 6.<br />

217 See <strong>Ofcom</strong>’s September 2008 consultation Appendix 7 of Annex 6.<br />

218 Virgin Media response to information request of 15 May 2007[ � ].<br />

219 Sky’s third response to <strong>Ofcom</strong>’s questions of 29 May 2008, [ � ].<br />

220 Sky response to Our September 2008 consultation Annex 3 paragraph 2.2.<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!