31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

Note that the table shows the launch year for particular services. The description of the services,<br />

however, aims to reflect the current situation.<br />

VoD<br />

7.87 VoD is a particular example of a delivery mechanism that does not favour satellite.<br />

As noted in our Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation, VoD services accounted for a smaller<br />

proportion of pay <strong>TV</strong> revenues in the UK than in other countries including Spain, the<br />

US and France.<br />

7.88 As noted above, Sky told us that 498 that there had been strong innovation in VoD,<br />

among other services, in the UK (although much of this was for basic FTA content).<br />

Sky argued that <strong>Ofcom</strong>’s analysis of VoD services in the UK was seriously flawed. It<br />

argued that there were multiple sources of VoD services carrying a wide range of<br />

content.<br />

7.89 VoD services were excluded from PwC’s innovation index. Sky provided a second<br />

report from PwC, to supplement the first. It said that the revised report incorporated<br />

VoD and near-VoD services into its innovation indicator and found that this did not<br />

significantly alter the ranking in its first report, with the UK remaining among the four<br />

leading countries. Sky said that this was hardly a surprise, as the number of VoD<br />

services available to UK consumers had increased substantially in the past few<br />

years.<br />

7.90 Sky presented this as evidence that <strong>Ofcom</strong>’s analysis of innovation in VoD provision<br />

was flawed. We do not consider this to be an accurate description of the PwC report.<br />

PwC’s innovation indicators combine two sets of indicators – one based on the<br />

introduction of a service, the other based on its penetration in the country<br />

concerned 499 . PwC considered whether robust VoD and nVoD indicators could be<br />

developed. However owing to the lack of data, it did not develop such penetration<br />

indicators 500 . As a result, its final ranking takes account only of the date of<br />

introduction of VoD and nVoD services in each country, not the penetration rate 501 .<br />

7.91 Sky also told us that VoD movies were available from Virgin Media, BT Vision, Tiscali<br />

<strong>TV</strong>, Top Up <strong>TV</strong>, Sky, 4oD, Apple <strong>TV</strong>, iTunes, Microsoft Xbox Live Marketplace and<br />

Lovefilm 502 .<br />

7.92 Of the nine platforms which Sky mentions (other than Sky itself), we note that<br />

Lovefilm does not appear to supply VoD movies, while iTunes is not a <strong>TV</strong> platform<br />

but rather a means of downloading movies to Apple <strong>TV</strong>. Among the remaining<br />

platforms, none provides Core Premium movies on VoD, and none is an SVoD<br />

service.<br />

7.93 Virgin Media argued that consumer demand for SVoD movies was strong and<br />

growing, but that it had been unable to negotiate SVoD rights to premium first-run<br />

498 Sky response to Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation, Section 2, paragraph 2.2.<br />

499 Second PwC report, page 76.<br />

500 Ibid, page 68.<br />

501 Ibid, page 77.<br />

502 Sky response, Annex 2, paragraph 2.7.<br />

240

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!