31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

Respondents’ views<br />

4.364 As with our assessment of direct wholesale demand side substitution for premium<br />

sports channels Sky argued that we failed to have regard to the argument that a<br />

retailer reallocating sales effort away from particular channels, rather than dropping<br />

those channels, could act as a constraint on the wholesale price 256 . In particular it<br />

cited the example of Virgin Media reallocating marketing effort to its PPV VoD<br />

service.<br />

Our current view<br />

4.365 In section 4.322 to 4.330 we consider the indirect constraint imposed by PPV movies<br />

and conclude that it is likely to be seen as an out of market constraint. In the section<br />

below we therefore assess market power by including it within the relevant market.<br />

For the reasons set out in paragraphs 4.316 to 4.318 we consider older library films<br />

would not be considered a substitute for consumers. We do not therefore think that<br />

direct substitution to these services would constrain a monopolist wholesaler. This<br />

means that demand side substitution is unlikely to broaden the market. In section 5<br />

below we consider whether retailers are able to exercise buyer power for example by<br />

reallocating marketing effort to products outside the relevant market.<br />

Changes in wholesale prices<br />

Our position in our Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation<br />

4.366 In our Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation we examined Sky’s claim that flat or falling<br />

wholesale prices for its premium channels are strongly suggestive that it does not<br />

have market power to set prices above competitive levels, and by implication that<br />

markets should be defined broadly 257 . Sky argued that the per subscriber wholesale<br />

carriage fees for its packages had been flat in real terms since 2004 and that the<br />

price of Movies Mix has declined.<br />

4.367 Furthermore it argued that “given the very significant increases in rights costs, …, the<br />

obvious implication is that margins between costs and prices have narrowed in<br />

relation to Sky’s channels at the wholesale level over the period”. 258<br />

4.368 We analysed changes in wholesale prices of the most popular wholesale Movie<br />

channel mixes over time 259,260 . The wholesale price of the Sky Sports and Movies Mix<br />

has [ � ] since 2005 but in September 2008 was [ � ] than it was in 2002. The<br />

price of Sky Movies Mix has [ � ] than it was in 2002.<br />

256 Sky Response of 1 June 2009 to <strong>Ofcom</strong>’s Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation “Additional comments on<br />

<strong>Ofcom</strong>’s analysis of market definition and market power in the pay <strong>TV</strong> review” Annex 1 3.34 - 3.37.<br />

257 Annex 2 to Sky’s non-confidential response to our December 2007 consultation, paragraphs 3.131-<br />

2.<br />

258 Ibid.<br />

259<br />

Sky Movies Mix and Sky Sports and Movies Mix are taken by [ � ]% of wholesale subscribers to<br />

Sky Movies channels.<br />

260 Our full analysis is contained in Annex 6, Appendix 6.<br />

128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!