31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

4.369 We said that falling wholesale prices for Sky Movies Mix channels could be evidence<br />

of an increasing competitive constraint from other substitutes, although it is not clear<br />

that this would be sufficient to reduce prices to competitive levels.<br />

4.370 We also examined the wholesale mark-up over programming costs. Our analysis in<br />

Figure 36 suggested a widening wholesale margin over costs.<br />

Figure 36 Variable programming costs as a proportion of the wholesale price<br />

[ � ]<br />

Source: Sky annual accounts 2002 to 2007, Sky response to information request of 29 th May 2008<br />

Note: Note: the analysis covers only UK and ROI residential subscribers, not commercial subscribers.<br />

We assume that all Sky Sports channel programming costs are fixed and all Sky Movies channel<br />

costs are variable with wholesale subscribers<br />

4.371 We therefore considered that the fall in wholesale prices of packages containing<br />

Movies Mix and Sports and Movies Mix does not necessarily imply an effective<br />

competitive wholesale constraint. In fact, the [ � ] and prices could indicate<br />

increasing market power.<br />

Respondents’ views<br />

4.372 Sky criticised our assessment of changes in wholesale prices 261 . It said that our<br />

conclusions were biased by the choice of start and end points of analysis It also said<br />

that our choice of inflation deflator was ‘unusual’.<br />

Our current view<br />

4.373 Figure 37 shows our analysis of wholesale prices under a range of different deflator<br />

assumptions taking comparable start and end dates as Sky suggested.<br />

Figure 37 Wholesale price changes Q2 2002 – Q2 2008<br />

[ � ]<br />

Source: Sky response to <strong>Ofcom</strong> information request of 29 May 2008.<br />

4.374 The alternative inflation deflators suggested by Sky do not materially affect our<br />

conclusions. Indeed, the GDP deflator generates results that lie near the middle of<br />

the plausible range. Similarly, we think that changing the start and end dates of our<br />

analysis only has a minimal effect on our results.<br />

4.375 We therefore remain of the view that there has been an increase in the margin of<br />

wholesale prices over per subscriber costs. This appears to us consistent with the<br />

view that wholesale prices are not constrained to competitive levels.<br />

Conclusion on relevant market for wholesale premium movie channels<br />

4.376 We remain of the view that there is a relevant economic market for wholesale<br />

premium movies channels. As with sports, we have reviewed a wide range of<br />

evidence:<br />

261 Sky response to September 2008 consultation Annex 6 4.3.<br />

129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!