31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Our current view<br />

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

4.390 As with our analysis of consumer response to price rises in our consideration of<br />

wholesale markets above we have estimated the minimum consumer elasticity that<br />

would be required to constrain a monopolist retailer from increasing prices above<br />

current levels.<br />

Figure 38 Estimates of Sky Movies subscribers’ elasticities and retail critical<br />

loss<br />

1 Minimum elasticity to constrain a retail<br />

monopolist (critical loss)<br />

Source: Critical loss: see Appendix 2 of Annex 6; Sky conjoint: [ � ] supplied to <strong>Ofcom</strong> by Sky in July<br />

2007<br />

4.391 The evidence from Sky’s conjoint survey appears to suggest that insufficient<br />

subscribers would switch to an alternative product to constrain a monopolist retailer.<br />

However the conclusion is less firm than with premium sports as the experiment only<br />

tested the impact of a [ � ]. For the reasons set out in paragraph 4.144 we do not<br />

rely on our estimates of elasticity from our willingness to pay survey.<br />

4.392 At the same time, actual numbers of subscribers to Sky Movies have declined<br />

somewhat despite falling real prices. However, we remain of the view that the<br />

cellophane fallacy effect is present: if prices are above competitive levels we would<br />

expect switching to be higher than if they were at competitive levels. Hence our<br />

evidence on consumers’ observed response to price changes could be consistent<br />

with an effective competitive constraint or switching in response to cellophane fallacy<br />

prices.<br />

Evidence of consumer preferences and product characteristics<br />

Our position in the First <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation<br />

Sky Sports<br />

and Movies<br />

Mix<br />

Sky Movies<br />

Mix<br />

[ � ] [ � ]<br />

2 Sky conjoint estimate [ � ] [ � ]<br />

4.393 For our First <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation, we commissioned a consumer research survey<br />

which asked Sky Movies consumers about the characteristics of the product that they<br />

particularly value 265 . The key conclusions of that research were:<br />

� Access to a wide range of films was the most important characteristic (cited by<br />

83% of subscribers as ‘must have’ or ‘nice to have’).<br />

� This was closely followed by having films available at all times, and access to<br />

new releases (cited by 70% and 72% of subscribers respectively).<br />

265 <strong>Ofcom</strong> pay <strong>TV</strong> research, <strong>phase</strong> 2, see Annex 14 to the First <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation.<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!