31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

Figure 33 Total audience for films on <strong>TV</strong> (not PPV) 1997 – 2007<br />

Million views<br />

Source: UK Film Council Year Book 2008, Figure 11.6<br />

4.318 We acknowledge that the increasing availability of films either within basic tier<br />

bundles or on FTA <strong>TV</strong> may in principle provide some competitive constraint on the<br />

wholesale supply of Sky Movies channels. For example, Film4 which went FTA in<br />

July 2006 and the Universal backed Picturebox which launched on various platforms<br />

in 2006 – 2007, both show a variety of older films from the FTA or library window).<br />

However the evidence does not point towards substitution from subscription channels<br />

to basic and FTA channels – rather it points to an overall decline in movie viewing on<br />

linear channels.<br />

4.319 As regards Sky’s analysis of downgrading customers, we do not consider that this is<br />

evidence that FTA movies are a substitute for premium movies. Instead, the<br />

evidence could simply reflect that viewers who stop subscribing to premium movies<br />

have an ongoing interest in watching movies, and now have more time to spend on<br />

other activities (other than watching Sky Movies), including watching FTA movies or<br />

other content 236 . It is not evident from this analysis that the availability of FTA movies<br />

or other <strong>TV</strong> content caused these viewers to downgrade or made them more willing<br />

to do so. Furthermore, the fact that downgraders’ overall television viewing increased<br />

when they dropped Sky movies appears counter-intuitive. It would appear that these<br />

viewers responded to having a smaller range of <strong>TV</strong> programming by watching more<br />

<strong>TV</strong>. This apparently anomalous result leads us to doubt the reliability of Sky’s<br />

analysis.<br />

4.320 In summary there is no evidence that this downgrading was a pricing response, or<br />

that FTA movies or other content should be included within the relevant market.<br />

236 Sky Response of 1 June 2009 to <strong>Ofcom</strong>’s Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation “Additional comments on<br />

<strong>Ofcom</strong>’s analysis of market definition and market power in the pay <strong>TV</strong> review” paragraphs 6.12 –<br />

6.14. Sky argued that in order to count as switching in a market definition analysis, alternatives must<br />

be relevant products in the sense of fulfilling similar consumer demands. It noted that if consumers<br />

bought fewer magazines in response to a price rise, and spent the money saved on food, this would<br />

not count as relevant switching. The example of consumers watching more FTA <strong>TV</strong> 3 years after<br />

terminating their Sky Movies subscription is analogous to Sky’s example of magazines and food and<br />

in the same way does not necessarily imply that the market should be broadened to include other<br />

content.<br />

120<br />

3,500<br />

3,000<br />

2,500<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

1,000<br />

500<br />

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

Subscription<br />

movie<br />

channels<br />

FTA and<br />

basic tier<br />

channels

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!