31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

238<br />

premium channels has been distorted in favour of satellite and away from cable<br />

over time.<br />

� These concerns are exacerbated as we look forward to the future; we are at a<br />

point where the potential choice of platforms is increasing, and is set to increase<br />

further. The chances of these options developing fully to the benefit of consumers<br />

are likely to be limited by the restricted availability of Core Premium channels.<br />

� We also have a current and forward-looking concern related to the possibility of<br />

market power in Core Premium channels distorting choice of wider bundles,<br />

which again is a concern that increases over time, as bundling becomes more<br />

widespread.<br />

7.82 We consider on the basis of the above that Sky’s approach to the wholesale supply<br />

of Core Premium channels results, and is likely to result in future, in an adverse<br />

effect on the interests of consumers.<br />

Innovation<br />

7.83 In our Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation (paragraphs 7.44 – 7.47) we noted that the<br />

record of innovation in platform enhancements was strong in the UK, particularly on<br />

Sky’s satellite platform. However, we noted that the PwC report commissioned by<br />

Sky focused on types of innovation that were well suited to satellite, and on which<br />

Sky had performed strongly, including HD, DVRs, and digital <strong>TV</strong> itself.<br />

7.84 We remain of the view that innovation in platform enhancement has been strong in<br />

the UK, but that it has been stronger in developments that favour satellite platforms,<br />

and less strong in those that favour non-satellite platforms.<br />

7.85 Looking forward, we see scope for platforms using technologies such as IP<strong>TV</strong> to<br />

develop much more substantially. We would expect to see the fastest progress in<br />

these areas if companies other than Sky were able to push them forward. Sky might<br />

also make some progress in IP<strong>TV</strong>, as an example – some of its set-top boxes<br />

already have the technical capability. However, as we set out in section 6, we believe<br />

that Sky has an incentive to manage the relative success of different retail<br />

businesses in favour of its core satellite platform. A much more dynamic environment<br />

would be likely if other companies were to gain access to the critically important Core<br />

Premium channels, to enable them to push forward with new ways of delivering <strong>TV</strong>.<br />

7.86 Figure 61 illustrates major innovations that have taken place in the pay <strong>TV</strong> sector in<br />

recent years.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!