31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

160<br />

expenditure on rights to movies, including less recent films such as library films 311 .<br />

These figures do not include Disney Cinemagic.<br />

Figure 43 Wholesale market shares including moderate ‘out of market’<br />

constraints (calculated using expenditure on rights to movies)<br />

Source: <strong>Ofcom</strong> calculations<br />

Sky BBC I<strong>TV</strong> Channel<br />

4<br />

Channel<br />

5<br />

Basic<br />

channels<br />

2007 [50-60]% [�]% [�]% [�]% [�]% [�]%<br />

2008 [50-60]% [�]% [�]% [�]% [�]% [�]%<br />

5.89 Sky’s market shares taking into account moderate ‘out of market’ substitutes remain<br />

high. Sky has a market share of [ � ]% [80-90%] if PPV movies, DVD rental<br />

subscription packages and legal movie downloads are taken into account. Sky also<br />

has a market share of [ � ] [50-60%] if library films are taken into account. Based on<br />

these market share figures, movies broadcast on free to air channels would appear<br />

to impose a stronger constraint on Sky Movies than that imposed by PPV movies,<br />

online DVD rentals and movie downloads. However, as explained in paragraph<br />

4.318, we consider that the characteristics of PPV movies, online DVD rentals and<br />

movie downloads are closer to those of Sky Movies because these services allow<br />

access to more recent films (whereas, in contrast, movies broadcast on FTA<br />

channels tend to be older).<br />

5.90 As explained above, while we have calculated alternative market shares including<br />

moderate substitutes for Core Premium Movie channels, we have not carried out this<br />

calculation including more remote substitutes. In particular, although we have<br />

included online DVD rentals in the above calculation, we have not included DVD<br />

retail sales. In its 1 June 2009 submission Sky asserted that this is inconsistent as<br />

there is no difference in the strength of our reasoning on the extent to which these<br />

products are substitutes. We do not agree. We recognise that if DVD retail sales<br />

were included in the relevant market then Sky would have a fairly low market share<br />

(approximately [ � ] [10-20%]) 312 . However we do not place significant weight on<br />

this figure. This is because DVD sales are a more remote substitute for Core<br />

Premium Movie channels, as evidenced by their very different characteristics and the<br />

pattern of retail price changes (see paragraphs 4.331 to 4.335).<br />

5.91 Sky argued that focusing on putative market shares understates the extent of the<br />

competitive constraints on its channels. As discussed in section 4, Sky provided<br />

material to support its argument that its Sky Movies channels are constrained. For<br />

example, Sky set out evidence that the number of subscribers to Sky Movies had<br />

fallen as has the real price.<br />

311 Use of this proxy for the attractiveness of films avoids the difficulties in identifying the revenue<br />

attributable to movies for free to air broadcasters or broadcasters for whom movies is only a small<br />

proportion of their output.<br />

312<br />

DVD retail sales in 2008 were £2.27bn. Source: BVA Yearbook 2009, British Video Association,<br />

page 28.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!