31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

Figure 56 Number and penetration of subscribers to Sky’s premium channels on<br />

satellite and cable<br />

[ � ]<br />

6.127 As shown in Figure 6 of our Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation, the result is that while Sky<br />

and Virgin have [ � ] of basic customers, Sky accounts for [ � ] of premium<br />

customers.<br />

6.128 We see various different drivers of the difference in penetration between cable and<br />

satellite.<br />

Summary<br />

206<br />

� Some consumers might choose cable in order to take telephony or broadband<br />

services; this is likely to have been particularly true in the early period shown in<br />

the chart above, when Sky did not offer triple-play bundles. It may be the case<br />

that for these people content is of lesser importance than for those people who<br />

choose satellite. This is likely to explain some of the difference. However, it does<br />

not explain why penetration would have decreased over time.<br />

� Some of this difference in penetration may be due to more people with a strong<br />

demand for premium channels choosing DSat in the first place – i.e. content<br />

driving the choice of platform – rather than Sky being intrinsically more efficient<br />

than Virgin Media in promoting premium channels to customers who have<br />

already signed up to the platform.<br />

� We can see from retail prices that bundles including Core Premium channels are<br />

higher via Virgin Media than via Sky, suggesting that Sky’s offer is more likely to<br />

be attractive to new customers.<br />

� For existing basic customers, the incremental price of Core Premium channels is<br />

higher, making it less immediately attractive for a customer to add Core Premium<br />

channels. As we have set out, Virgin Media appears not to have a strong<br />

incentive to try to sell Core Premium channels to existing basic subscribers.<br />

6.129 Sky’s practice of charging Virgin Media the highest prices which Sky believes meet<br />

the conditions of a margin squeeze test leaves Virgin Media with limited incentive to<br />

promote Sky’s Core Premium channels to its customers. As a result, people with a<br />

strong demand for these services are more likely (and increasingly likely over time) to<br />

choose DSat. Sky’s reluctance to supply services such as HD tends to exacerbate<br />

this effect. The Core Premium channels are “licensed services” for the purposes of<br />

s316 CA03. We therefore consider that Sky’s approach to the wholesale supply of<br />

Core Premium channels creates a position in which there is not, and there is not<br />

likely to be, fair and effective competition in the wholesale of Core Premium channels<br />

and the retail supply of bundles which include Core Premium channels.<br />

Commercial premises<br />

6.130 While the discussion to this point has focused on supply to residential subscribers,<br />

pay <strong>TV</strong> services including Sky’s Core Premium channels are also supplied to<br />

commercial premises – mostly pubs and clubs, but also hotels, offices and holiday<br />

parks, among others.<br />

6.131 The Association of Licensed Multiple Retailers (ALMR), a trade body which<br />

represents licensed retailers (who comprise the majority of commercial pay <strong>TV</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!