31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

92<br />

relationship between demand for premium channels and availability of DTT. There<br />

are several reasons for this potential overstatement:<br />

� The estimate of the relationship between DTT availability and demand for Sky<br />

premium channels is not robust to changes in model specification.<br />

� The instrument chosen to treat the endogeneity of availability of DTT may be<br />

invalid as it has a role in determining demand.<br />

� The study ignores the potential problem of endogeneity of access to cable.<br />

Without treating this problem we cannot be sure that any of the estimated<br />

coefficients are not biased.<br />

4.180 The question for our analysis is whether FTA <strong>TV</strong> is a sufficient constraint on premium<br />

sports channels to be included within the relevant market.<br />

4.181 We recognise that the Seabright study shows some interaction between demand for<br />

Freeview and pay <strong>TV</strong> – as, indeed, one would expect. However, it does not model<br />

the effect of a price increase, and as such does not provide direct evidence that<br />

Freeview is a constraint on the prices of premium sports channels.<br />

4.182 Given the growth in the number of FTA channels and the increasing popularity of<br />

Freeview, we might expect that if FTA <strong>TV</strong> and premium sports channels were strong<br />

substitutes, we would observe a competitive response from Sky in the form of lower<br />

prices or margins for its Sky Sports channels, or for Sky Sports to have lost<br />

subscribers.<br />

4.183 As we set out in paragraphs 4.200 to 4.208 below, the relationship between prices,<br />

quality and programming costs is complex. Nonetheless we observe that both the<br />

price of Sky Sports Mix packages, and [ � ], while the total number of subscribers to<br />

Sky Sports Mix packages has increased over this period. Oxera’s analysis 157 also<br />

shows that the growth of FTA has not prevented Sky from making high profits from its<br />

pay <strong>TV</strong> channels.<br />

4.184 Taken together we consider these factors suggest that the growth of FTA channels<br />

has not sufficiently constrained Sky’s pricing of Sky Sports for FTA channels to be<br />

included in the same market.<br />

Supply side substitution<br />

4.185 We turn now to the question of supply side substitution. Wholesale supply side<br />

substitution would occur if a broadcaster were to introduce its own sports channel in<br />

response to an increase in the price of Sky Sports 1. The OFT guidelines 158 on<br />

market definition suggest that to be considered as a relevant constraint:<br />

� Supply side substitution should occur within a reasonably short period of time – a<br />

year.<br />

� Entrants should not incur substantial sunk costs.<br />

157 See section 6.<br />

158 OFT 2004 Market Definition Guidelines paragraph 3.15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!