31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(4) In this section—<br />

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

“connected services”, in relation to licensed services, means the<br />

provision of programmes for inclusion in licensed services and any<br />

other services provided for purposes connected with, or with the<br />

provision of, licensed services; and<br />

“licensed service” means a service licensed by a Broadcasting Act<br />

licence.”<br />

2.11 Under s316 <strong>Ofcom</strong> has the power, acting as sectoral regulator, to ensure fair and<br />

effective competition in relation to the provision of licensed services 9 . When<br />

analysing competition concerns within the context of s316, we therefore consider<br />

whether those concerns create a risk that fair and effective competition is not<br />

occurring, and will not occur. If that is the case, then we consider what conditions (if<br />

any) it may be appropriate to insert into licences to make certain of providing for fair<br />

and effective competition against that risk. That may involve, consistent with our<br />

principal duty under s3(1)(b), intervening, in the interests of consumers, on an ex<br />

ante basis to promote competition.<br />

2.12 In section 8 of the Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation we set out an explanation of our<br />

s316 powers. We explained that Sky holds television licensable content service<br />

licences under the Broadcasting Act 1990 for its premium sports and movie<br />

channels. These channels are therefore “licensed services” for the purpose of s316.<br />

<strong>Ofcom</strong> therefore has the power to include conditions in the licences for those<br />

services that we consider appropriate for ensuring fair and effective competition in<br />

the provision of those channels, and any services provided for purposes connected<br />

with the provision of those channels. We explained that we considered there is a risk<br />

that fair and effective competition in the provision of the licensed services is not and<br />

will not occur in respect of Sky’s wholesaling of channels subject to broadcasting<br />

licences. We considered it may therefore be appropriate to intervene in the wholesale<br />

of Core Premium channels to ensure fair and effective competition is occurring and<br />

will occur. We therefore proposed to consider further the imposition of a licence<br />

condition to ensure fair and effective competition in the form of a wholesale mustoffer<br />

obligation.<br />

2.13 We now set out below the framework for our analysis under s316 in this <strong>document</strong>:<br />

� In section 3 we set out some of the background context to our assessment of the<br />

sector, which highlights again the importance to pay <strong>TV</strong> markets of licensed<br />

channels which include premium content.<br />

� In section 4 we define the markets that are relevant to our consideration of<br />

whether there is a risk that fair and effective competition in the provision of<br />

licensed channels including premium content is not occurring and will not occur.<br />

� In section 5 we consider whether Sky holds a degree of market power in those<br />

markets such that it has the ability to act in a manner which is inconsistent with<br />

the conditions for ensuring fair and effective competition. We reach the view that<br />

Sky does hold that market power in relation to the supply of Core Premium<br />

channels.<br />

9 Or connected services<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!