31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

increase in content, the flexibility over how it can be consumed and a lower real<br />

price 480 .<br />

7.45 Virgin Media reiterated its concerns that <strong>Ofcom</strong>'s analysis failed to provide any<br />

information on customer satisfaction levels which might otherwise prevail under more<br />

competitive market conditions. It believed that the current results in that respect are<br />

biased 481 .<br />

Our current view<br />

7.46 We distinguish between effects which arise from restricted distribution of Core<br />

Premium channels and restricted exploitation of particular content rights, and those<br />

which arise from high wholesale prices.<br />

7.47 Restricted distribution of Core Premium channels and restricted exploitation of<br />

content rights affect both the choice which is available to consumers, and the scope<br />

for innovation (including the large scale adoption of innovative products) in the<br />

market. High wholesale prices are likely to be directly reflected in the retail prices<br />

consumers pay for pay <strong>TV</strong> services which include Core Premium channels. We<br />

consider each of these effects in turn.<br />

7.48 We have not conducted any further analysis of consumer satisfaction. However we<br />

share Virgin Media’s concern as to the limited usefulness of survey evidence in this<br />

regard. Customers may well express high levels of satisfaction if a service is<br />

provided at a quality and price they have come to expect, but that does not rule out<br />

the possibility that a change in the market, through greater price competition or more<br />

innovation, would greatly increase consumer welfare.<br />

7.49 We consider in this section both those effects from our competition concerns that we<br />

can observe already having an impact on consumers now, and also those effects that<br />

are likely to have more of an impact as the pay <strong>TV</strong> landscape develops into the<br />

future.<br />

Choice<br />

7.50 Consumers have a limited choice of retailers from whom they can purchase Core<br />

Premium channels. As we have set out in section 6, distribution of the most important<br />

pay <strong>TV</strong> content is limited to certain platforms. Given that only around half of all<br />

homes are in areas where cable is available 482 , this means that around half of UK<br />

households only have a single option 483 for subscribing to a pay <strong>TV</strong> service which<br />

includes these channels.<br />

7.51 Many consumers have strong preferences for particular <strong>TV</strong> channels or content, as<br />

we set out in section 3 and in our market definition analysis in section 4. Consumers<br />

are also likely to have preferences for a particular delivery platform, since different<br />

480 Sky response, section 2, paragraph 4.6.<br />

481 Virgin Media response, Annex 1, paragraph 23.4.<br />

482 Virgin Media reaches 12.6 million homes in the UK out of a total of around 25.7 million (Source:<br />

Virgin Media, Annual Report 2008, page 7; National Statistics, Social Trends 2008).<br />

483<br />

Some of these households may not be able to access Sky DSat either, because of technical or<br />

other restrictions.<br />

231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!