31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

4.321 We set out our views on the implications of the Seabright econometric study for<br />

market definition above in paragraphs 4.172 to 4.184. Those arguments apply<br />

equally here: we do not believe the Seabright study provides evidence that FTA<br />

channels and premium movie channels are in the same market.<br />

4.322 Movies shown on SVoD and PPV: Sky told us it considered that the relevant<br />

market included FTA, pay <strong>TV</strong> services, DVD sales and rental and pay-per-view/video<br />

on demand services.<br />

4.323 Movies from the pay <strong>TV</strong> subscription window are not available on any SVoD service<br />

at present. As such we have seen no direct empirical evidence as to whether such a<br />

service would be a competitive constraint on linear premium movie channels.<br />

However, it seems reasonable to expect that if a similar range of premium movies (at<br />

a given time) were available over both a linear channel and an SVoD service, there<br />

would be scope for some customers to switch from the former to the latter.<br />

4.324 Virgin Media told us 237 that it had been unable to secure non-exclusive SVoD rights<br />

with any of the Major Hollywood Studios. [ � ].<br />

4.325 Sky noted 238 that Virgin Media’s pay-per-view VoD proposition includes movies from<br />

the Major Hollywood Studios, via the Filmflex service, both before and after their<br />

availability on Sky’s linear movie channels. Whether this has had a direct impact on<br />

demand for Sky’s linear channels is unclear. The similarity of content between the<br />

two delivery mechanisms may be seen as a supporting a view of premium movies on<br />

PPV as belonging to the same market as linear movie channels.<br />

4.326 Figure 34 shows total cable subscriber numbers from 2000 to 2008. FilmFlex –<br />

cable’s on demand system for PPV movies – was launched in January 2005,<br />

replacing the Front Row nVoD service. FilmFlex was a joint venture between OGD,<br />

Walt Disney and Sony Pictures.<br />

4.327 The figure is consistent with the view that FilmFlex may have had an impact on<br />

demand for Sky’s linear movie channels on cable. The number of subscribers to Sky<br />

Movies and Sports has declined, with more customers subscribing to a sports-only<br />

offer (perhaps switching from the Movies and Sports offer – i.e. dropping movies),<br />

and fewer customers subscribing to the movies-only offer.<br />

4.328 Data on subscriptions to Sky’s DSat service also shows a reduction in subscribers to<br />

the Sky Sports and Movies package, again with an increase in subscriptions to Sky<br />

Sports Mix. However, in the case of Sky’s DSat service, unlike Virgin Media,<br />

subscriptions to the Sky Movies Mix have also increased 239 .<br />

Figure 34 Subscribers to premium channels on cable, 2000 - 2008<br />

[ � ]<br />

Sources: Sky response to <strong>Ofcom</strong> information request of 29 May 2008 and Virgin Media response to<br />

<strong>Ofcom</strong> information request of 2 July 2008<br />

237 Virgin Media response, paragraphs 4.19 to 4.22.<br />

238 Sky Response, Section 2, paragraph 2.10.<br />

239 See for example Figure 31.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!