31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Barriers to entry and expansion<br />

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

5.166 In principle, a firm could enter the market and begin supplying retail television<br />

bundles containing Core Premium Movie channels by acquiring such channels from<br />

Sky and/or Disney. However the analysis of barriers to entry and expansion in the<br />

retail supply of bundles including Core Premium Sports channels in paragraphs<br />

5.128 to 5.132 above also applies here.<br />

5.167 In particular, currently Sky only supplies its Core Premium Movie channels to itself<br />

and retailers using cable as a distribution technology. As discussed in section 6,<br />

retailers using IP<strong>TV</strong> and DTT as a distribution technology have been unable to reach<br />

an agreement with Sky to purchase Sky Movies. We thus consider that it is very<br />

unlikely that retailers using a distribution technology other than cable will be able to<br />

acquire Sky’s Core Premium Movie channels. This lack of access to these channels<br />

acts both as a significant entry barrier and as a barrier to expansion for retailers<br />

(such as BT Vision and Top Up <strong>TV</strong>) that currently do not retail Sky’s Core Premium<br />

Movie channels.<br />

5.168 Moreover, as explained above, we do not consider that it is plausible that a new<br />

entrant would use cable as a distribution technology. Further, whilst in principle a<br />

new entrant might seek to acquire Disney Cinemagic, we consider that such entry<br />

(even if it occurred) would be unlikely to constrain Sky’s retail prices for the supply of<br />

bundles containing Core Premium Movie channels. The weak constraint that this<br />

channel imposes of Sky Movies, and thus on retailers of Sky Movies, is<br />

demonstrated by the relative wholesale market shares of Sky and Disney (see<br />

paragraph 5.84 above).<br />

Countervailing buyer power<br />

5.169 Retail television bundles containing Core Premium Movie channels are supplied to<br />

individual residential households. Individual households do not possess CBP to offset<br />

any seller power that exists.<br />

Conclusion on the ability to sustain retail prices appreciably above the competitive<br />

level<br />

5.170 Sky enjoys a high retail market share in the retail supply of bundles containing Core<br />

Premium Movie channels. Indeed Sky’s market share is above the 50% threshold at<br />

which dominance can be presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary. The<br />

exception is one of the measures that includes moderate ‘out of market’ constraints,<br />

where Sky’s market share is [ � ]% [40-50%]. Moreover, we consider that there are<br />

significant barriers to entry and expansion, including non-cable retailers’ lack of<br />

access to Sky’s Core Premium Movie channels 335 . There is no CBP. Accordingly,<br />

applying the ‘standard’ market definition test, the conclusion is that Sky enjoys a<br />

dominant position that gives it the ability to sustain retail prices appreciably above the<br />

competitive level.<br />

5.171 The caveats set out in paragraph 5.135 above, as part of the assessment of retail<br />

television bundles containing Core Premium Sports channels, also apply here.<br />

335 See also the discussion of switching costs in paragraphs 5.142 to 5.146 above.<br />

177

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!