31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

2.32 The purpose of the sectoral competition regime provided under s316 is to give <strong>Ofcom</strong><br />

the power to impose licence conditions to make certain of providing for fair and<br />

effective competition. In doing so it must take into account its other relevant sectoral<br />

duties, including its principal duty to protect the interests of consumers, where<br />

appropriate by promoting competition. In contrast, <strong>Ofcom</strong>’s role as a concurrent<br />

competition authority under the Chapter II prohibition of CA98 provides it with the<br />

power to prosecute, on an ex post basis, an undertaking that has acted unlawfully by<br />

abusing a dominant position. As discussed above, this was clearly set out in the<br />

parliamentary debate on the purpose of s316.<br />

2.33 The test under s317 is concerned with what power it is more appropriate to proceed<br />

under. It does not require <strong>Ofcom</strong> to establish that it is not possible to use CA98<br />

powers to address the issues concerned.<br />

2.34 We also do not agree with the suggestion that <strong>Ofcom</strong> must, before deciding to<br />

proceed under s316, conduct a detailed examination under a CA98 framework. Even<br />

in cases where <strong>Ofcom</strong> was considering using s316 as an ex ante measure to prevent<br />

a CA98 breach (as Sky suggests), a requirement, in essence, to first conduct a CA98<br />

case to determine the lack of a breach, would defeat the purpose of having the ex<br />

ante power.<br />

2.35 Further, it would not serve any purpose to conduct a detailed CA98 case if s316 was<br />

being considered explicitly on the basis that the competition concerns envisaged<br />

might not result in CA98 breaches. This brings us back to the differences discussed<br />

above over the scope of s316, and the difference between “ensuring fair and<br />

effective competition” and preventing breaches of CA98 from occurring.<br />

The duties relevant to our assessment under s316<br />

Our position in September<br />

2.36 In the Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation we described the duties which we considered to<br />

be relevant to the market investigation 14 .<br />

2.37 We highlighted that <strong>Ofcom</strong> has a principal duty under s3(1)(b) CA03 to further the<br />

interests of consumers in relevant markets, where appropriate by promoting<br />

competition. We said that this duty to promote competition means that we are<br />

required, where appropriate, to take a dynamic and forward-looking view of the<br />

effectiveness with which competition is expected to deliver benefits to consumers.<br />

We explained that we would carry out that assessment by reference to our statutory<br />

duties, the statutory framework and the criteria we have developed for the<br />

assessment of the industry.<br />

Respondents’ views<br />

2.38 Sky argued that we placed an inappropriate level of emphasis on the second part of<br />

the s3(1)(b) duty, i.e. “where appropriate by promoting competition”. In its view the<br />

promotion of competition does not constitute the duty – the focus of the duty is to<br />

further the interests of consumers. Sky thought that we had not properly taken into<br />

account our other duties under the Act – in particular sections 3(3), 6 and 7 – and<br />

that we should also have considered the desirability of encouraging investment and<br />

innovation.<br />

14 See paragraphs 2.19 to 2.23<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!