31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

[ � ]% [90-100%] 309 . This is well above the 50% threshold at which dominance<br />

under a CA98 analysis can be presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary.<br />

Disney accounted for the remaining [ � ]% [0-10%] share. This strongly suggests<br />

that Disney Cinemagic is a weak constraint on Sky’s Core Premium Movie channels.<br />

This is consistent with the characteristics of Disney Cinemagic. As discussed in<br />

paragraphs 4.256, Disney Cinemagic only features a small number of first run movies<br />

and the majority of its output is targeted at children, which suggests that it is not a<br />

particularly close substitute for Sky Movies channels.<br />

Out of market constraints<br />

5.85 As explained in paragraph 4.377, we recognise that there is a moderate degree of<br />

substitutability between Core Premium Movie channels and PPV movies, DVD rental<br />

subscription packages and library films. On balance, we took the view that they do<br />

not lie within the relevant market, but they nonetheless are moderately close<br />

substitutes for Sky Movies channels.<br />

5.86 We have thus considered the extent of the constraint imposed by these ‘out of<br />

market’ products. In particular, we have calculated market shares as if this<br />

moderately substitutable content were within the relevant market. These market<br />

shares provide an upper estimate for the strength of the competitive constraint that<br />

may be exercised by products that lie somewhat outside of the relevant market but<br />

that may nonetheless act as (imperfect) substitutes.<br />

5.87 First, we have calculated market shares taking into account <strong>three</strong> other ways in<br />

which consumers can pay to watch movies: (i) PPV movies; (ii) online DVD rental<br />

services (such as Lovefilm); and (iii) legal movie downloads (to rent or own). These<br />

market shares were calculated based on revenues earned by these various<br />

services 310 .<br />

Figure 42 Wholesale market shares in 2008 including moderate ‘out of market’<br />

constraints (calculated using revenue data)<br />

Sky Disney Virgin<br />

Media<br />

Others<br />

Including PPV [90-100]% [0-10]% [0-10]% [0-10]%<br />

Including online DVD rental services [80-90]% [0-10]% [0-10]% [10-20]%<br />

Including legal movie downloads [90-100]% [0-10]% [0-10]% [0-10]%<br />

Including all of the above [80-90]% [0-10]% [0-10]% [10-20]%<br />

Source: <strong>Ofcom</strong> calculations<br />

5.88 Second, we have calculated market shares taking into account movies screened on<br />

other channels. These market shares were calculated based on broadcasters’<br />

309 If Sky’s wholesale revenues are calculated using the incremental wholesale price of Sky Movies<br />

then Sky’s market share remains extremely high (around [ � ] [90-100%]). See Annex 8 for further<br />

details.<br />

310 In particular, we calculated these figures using the retail revenue generated from PPV movies,<br />

online DVD rental packages and legal movie downloads, rather than the wholesale revenues<br />

associated with these services. This is likely to overstate their wholesale market share.<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!