31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

conclusions on market power do not depend on this conclusion, since expanding our<br />

market definition to include online DVD rentals does not materially change our<br />

assessment of market power.<br />

4.343 For the reasons stated in paragraphs 4.157 to 4.160 we do not believe that our<br />

choice of price deflator, the start and end dates of the analysis, or our assessment of<br />

the use of discounts change our conclusion that the inflation adjusted price for Sky<br />

Movies had been broadly constant since 2002 and the price of Sky Sports and<br />

Movies Mix had been broadly constant since 2004.<br />

4.344 Our view on the margin of prices over input costs remains as before. There has been<br />

[ � ] in programming costs for Sky Movies channels without any significant<br />

reduction in retail prices. This does not suggest to us a strong competitive constraint<br />

on Sky’s pricing of its movie channels.<br />

4.345 Overall, while we recognise that there has been a reduction in the number of<br />

subscribers to Sky Movies over the past few years, we do not believe this provides<br />

evidence that Sky’s premium movies channels are constrained to competitive levels.<br />

In particular:<br />

� Demand for the most likely close substitutes to premium movie channels –<br />

namely movies shown on other channels and DVD rentals – has also declined.<br />

� Real prices have remained broadly constant despite sharp falls in input costs.<br />

The potential constraint from content downloaded over the internet<br />

Our position in our Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation<br />

4.346 In our Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation we considered the constraint from content<br />

downloaded over the internet.<br />

4.347 In response to our First <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation Sky said that we had failed to<br />

appreciate the importance of content delivered on the internet. In particular this<br />

meant our assessment was insufficiently forward looking. For example, Sky cited the<br />

popularity of the downloadable content offered by existing broadcasters, including the<br />

BBC’s iPlayer, Channel 4’s 4OD service, I<strong>TV</strong>.com, and Sky’s own online service<br />

(now called Sky Player) 248 .<br />

4.348 We agreed that downloading content to watch from the internet offers consumers a<br />

wide range of content that can be accessed relatively easily and viewed at their<br />

convenience.<br />

4.349 We also commissioned a survey to understand the current level of consumption of<br />

content delivered via the internet. Our survey indicated that relatively few consumers<br />

currently download content, and that the constraint is therefore relatively weak. For<br />

example, only 13% of Sky’s premium subscribers had downloaded content from the<br />

internet in the last month.<br />

4.350 [ � ] 249 [ � ].<br />

248 Sky response to <strong>Ofcom</strong>’s December 2007 consultation Annex 6, appendix 1.<br />

249 Annex 21 Sky response to <strong>Ofcom</strong> request for information of 29 th May.<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!