31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Premium customers on cable<br />

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

7.64 We do not have a significant concern that there is a distortion of consumer choice in<br />

relation to the [ � ] consumers currently on cable and purchasing Core Premium<br />

channels. It is possible that these consumers would have purchased Core Premium<br />

channels on DTT or IP<strong>TV</strong> had they been available on these platforms, but the fact<br />

that they have chosen the cable platform over DSat, despite their interest in Core<br />

Premium content, suggests that they do value certain features of the cable platform.<br />

Other households<br />

7.65 While households with a very strong demand for Sky’s Core Premium channels are<br />

likely to subscribe to DSat or cable, there is evidence, described below, of substantial<br />

unmet demand among other households for Core Premium channels, This unmet<br />

demand might arise for a variety of reasons including:<br />

� Inability to access existing satellite or cable platforms. Such consumers may live<br />

outside cable areas and be unable or unwilling to have a satellite dish<br />

� A preference for content to be delivered via DTT or IP<strong>TV</strong>-based platforms, on<br />

which Core Premium channels are not currently available, for example because<br />

of a preference for ‘Video on Demand’ services.<br />

� A preference for entry-level premium content bundles, of a type which are not<br />

currently available. Such consumers may be unwilling to pay for a full package of<br />

premium content at current prices, but would be interested in the types of entrylevel<br />

packages introduced by Setanta 491 .<br />

7.66 This raises a specific concern that a proportion of the 13.7m households that are not<br />

currently on either DSat or cable would subscribe to Core Premium channels if these<br />

were widely available on DTT or IP<strong>TV</strong> platforms, but that they are currently unable to<br />

do so.<br />

7.67 Research carried out by Freeview in November 2007 found that around 22% of<br />

Freeview users would definitely or probably consider paying either a monthly or oneoff<br />

fee to access more channels / programmes in addition to Freeview's channels 492 .<br />

While this research did not specify which channels consumers would particularly like<br />

to take up via DTT, our own consumer research indicates that sports and movies are<br />

the two most popular genres where there is a high degree of exclusivity to pay <strong>TV</strong><br />

(see section 3).<br />

7.68 Further evidence comes from Sky’s proposed Picnic service. Sky estimated (in April<br />

2008) that around [ � ] current DTT households would subscribe to premium<br />

content on its proposed Picnic service within <strong>three</strong> years of launch, and equivalent to<br />

around [ � ] per cent of DTT households, and [ � ] within five years. This suggests<br />

that a significant number of households who do not subscribe to DSat or cable would<br />

491<br />

Although following Setanta’s exit from the market, it remains to be seen to what extent ESPN’s<br />

packaging and pricing will follow Setanta’s.<br />

492 462 face-to-face interviews were conducted between 14 and 25 November 2007 by Taylor Nelson<br />

Sofres on behalf of Freeview. 70% of respondents were Freeview viewers and 30% were non-digital<br />

viewers.<br />

235

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!