31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

� Second, consider whether Sky has the ability to charge a retail margin that is<br />

appreciably above the competitive level; and<br />

� Third, set out some factors that are relevant to the extent of retail market<br />

competition absent the exercise of wholesale market power.<br />

The ability to sustain retail prices appreciably above the competitive level<br />

5.122 In the First <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation we considered whether Sky had the ability to sustain<br />

retail prices appreciably above the competitive level and concluded that it was likely<br />

that Sky was dominant in the “retailing of premium sports packages” (Annex 13,<br />

paragraph 5.38).<br />

Current retail market shares<br />

5.123 We have calculated market shares as a proportion of the retail revenues earned by<br />

Sky, Virgin Media, Setanta, Top Up <strong>TV</strong> and BT Vision from the supply of retail<br />

television bundles containing Core Premium Sports channels. These are summarised<br />

in Figure 44 below (in this figure, we have aggregated the negligible retail market<br />

shares of Setanta, Top Up <strong>TV</strong> and BT Vision). These market shares were calculated<br />

based on the revenue earned from retail television bundles containing Core Premium<br />

Sports channels. We have included the entire revenue earned from a retail television<br />

bundle, including any mandatory non-television components 324 . This has the effect of<br />

depressing the market share of retailers such as Top Up <strong>TV</strong> and Setanta that supply<br />

smaller bundles for a lower price.<br />

Figure 44 Market shares in the supply of retail television bundles containing<br />

Core Premium Sports channels (calculated on a revenue basis)<br />

Sky Virgin Media Others<br />

2H 2007 [70-80]% [20-30]% [0-10]%<br />

1H 2008 [70-80]% [20-30]% [0-10]%<br />

1H 2008 [70-80]% [20-30]% [0-10]%<br />

Source: <strong>Ofcom</strong> calculations<br />

5.124 Sky accounts for a very high proportion of the revenue earned from the supply of<br />

retail television bundles containing Core Premium Sports channels, with Virgin Media<br />

being the only other retailer with a material market share.<br />

324 For example, Setanta Sports 1 is available on DSat as a bundle with other Setanta Sports<br />

channels for £12.99/month. We have used the entire retail revenue from that bundle. Similarly, where<br />

a household subscribes to Sky’s sports mix package and one basic mix (for a price of £35.50/month)<br />

we have used the entire retail price of that bundle. We have not included revenue from certain addons<br />

to this package such as multiroom. A household that subscribes to Virgin Media “M” television<br />

package plus Sky’s dual sports package ostensibly receives the basic “M” package for ‘free’ whilst<br />

paying £30/month for the additional sports channels. However that package is only available if the<br />

household purchases a phone line from Virgin Media for £11 month. Since that phone line is a<br />

mandatory component of the television bundle we have used the overall bundle price of £41/month<br />

when calculating retail market shares.<br />

167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!