31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

Entrants on DTT would also incur fixed transmission costs relating to Core Premium<br />

content, which we have estimated at £[ � ]m per videostream per annum 568 .<br />

10.62 The number of new entrants which emerge following the implementation of the<br />

remedy and, consequently, the total additional fixed costs to the industry, will depend<br />

largely on the range of wholesale charges that we specify. As explained in section 9,<br />

we have set out a range of prices based on either large or small competitors. Our<br />

central case is one focused on a large competitor, achieving <strong>three</strong> million subscribers<br />

over 10 years. However, there may well be more than one competitor in practice.<br />

10.63 In light of the above, it seems credible that over the five year reference period, the<br />

total additional fixed costs incurred by new entrants might fall within the range of £34<br />

million to £52 million per annum. Note that these fixed costs are incurred over and<br />

above those incurred in retailing basic packages.<br />

10.64 As shown in Figure 71, the average cost per subscriber is greater for the new<br />

entrants we envisage in our pricing modelling than for Sky. The area between the two<br />

new entrant curves 569 and the Sky curve represents in each case the relative<br />

importance of fixed costs implied in the proposed wholesale prices.<br />

Figure 71 Graph showing average costs (£ per subscriber per month) excluding<br />

subscriber acquisition costs and capital expenditure, incurred by each new entrant<br />

under a wholesale must-offer remedy<br />

Average cost per subscriber per month<br />

10.65 In our quantitative analysis, we have derived the difference in producer surplus for<br />

Sky’s retail competitors compared with the counterfactual. In our central case, the<br />

568 [ � ].<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Sky<br />

Single new entrant retailer - 3 million subscribers<br />

Single new entrant retailer - 1 million subscribers<br />

569 The two curves refer to the ‘large’ and ‘small’ competitors we referred to in section 9, which<br />

achieve <strong>three</strong> million and one million subscribers respectively over 10 years.<br />

329

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!