31.01.2013 Views

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

Pay TV phase three document - Stakeholders - Ofcom

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> <strong>phase</strong> <strong>three</strong> <strong>document</strong> – non-confidential version<br />

44<br />

� [ � ].<br />

International examples<br />

3.30 We continue to believe that the international case studies from around Europe that<br />

we set out in our Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation illustrate the importance of sports<br />

rights in particular 37 . Amounts paid for rights were high in Germany, Spain, Italy and<br />

France, as in the UK.<br />

3.31 Changes in rights ownership in France and Germany also illustrated the importance<br />

of top-flight football rights to pay <strong>TV</strong> operators. Premiere’s subscriber numbers<br />

dropped in 2006 for the first time since 1997 on the back of Premiere losing rights to<br />

broadcast live Bundesliga matches. Similarly, seven years of consistent growth<br />

turned to a decrease in subscriber numbers for TPS in France upon it losing its rights<br />

to Ligue 1 matches.<br />

Premium subscribers<br />

3.32 We noted the substantial numbers of UK consumers that are prepared to pay a<br />

premium specifically to acquire premium sports and movies services over and above<br />

a basic service. There is little change in this picture since our Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong><br />

Consultation: over six million UK consumers are willing to take up premium channels,<br />

most of them paying a price of over £40 a month for a range of sports and movies<br />

content, compared to less than £20 for some basic services.<br />

Likely future developments<br />

3.33 We also considered whether these types of content are likely to continue to be as<br />

important in the longer term as we believe them to be now.<br />

� Our view was and remains that live top-flight sports programming is likely to<br />

have an enduring appeal, regardless of technical change. Broadcast media are<br />

intrinsically well suited to content which is based on mass participation in major<br />

live events, and this is unlikely to change in the foreseeable future.<br />

� The same may not however be true of movie programming, since although<br />

blockbuster movies are likely to retain their appeal, the simultaneous broadcast<br />

of a small number of movies to a large number of viewers is unlikely to remain<br />

the most effective means of distribution in the longer term. It is not difficult to<br />

imagine a world in which they are generally accessed more directly, for example<br />

via various forms of internet download. Movie download services are already<br />

available, though they have yet to be taken up by large numbers of consumers<br />

3.34 Having established that some content can drive take-up of pay <strong>TV</strong> services, we need<br />

to establish which specific channels contain content of sufficient importance to drive<br />

take-up, and whether those channels are sufficiently concentrated in the hands of<br />

particular companies to raise possible competition concerns. This is the purpose of<br />

our market definition and market power analysis, which follows in subsequent<br />

sections.<br />

37 See section 3 of our Second <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Consultation for full details –<br />

http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/second_paytv/condoc.pdf.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!