08.02.2013 Views

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Second, the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> will have strong resilience<br />

to stay on top. Even when <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> reaches its full<br />

potential <strong>and</strong> becomes a much more powerful nation,<br />

the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> will still be too big to be No. 2 to<br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>. 23 A U.K.-like change <strong>in</strong> the U.S.-<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> relationship<br />

is very unlikely. <strong>The</strong> UK is much smaller than<br />

the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. Its hegemonic reach was historically<br />

conditioned. As Organski notes, ord<strong>in</strong>arily, the UK<br />

would have no chance to rule the world, but as the<br />

first nation to become <strong>in</strong>dustrialized, the UK was able<br />

to become a global hegemon while much of the world<br />

was still <strong>in</strong> the underdeveloped agrarian stage. When<br />

the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> became the hegemonic power, the<br />

UK had no choice but to take a subord<strong>in</strong>ate role. This<br />

is not the case between the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>.<br />

Reluctant Accommodations?<br />

This is a very peculiar aspect of the U.S.-<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong><br />

power transition. Other matters aside, the <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>States</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> both believe that some key changes<br />

<strong>in</strong> the other will make the transition, <strong>and</strong> the world<br />

for that matter, a peaceful one. For the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>,<br />

the most desirable change <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> is for its government<br />

to become a democratic <strong>in</strong>stitution. For <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>,<br />

it is a curtailment of U.S. hegemonic conduct <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

politics <strong>and</strong> the democratization of <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

relations. It is quite ironic that the “champion of<br />

democracy (i.e., the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>)” is accused of practic<strong>in</strong>g<br />

“dictatorship” <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational affairs whereas<br />

an authoritarian <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> promotes democracy <strong>in</strong> the<br />

world. 24 This irony, however, is surely the miss<strong>in</strong>g<br />

l<strong>in</strong>k between the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>, the peaceful<br />

evolution of which can make the U.S.-<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> power<br />

transition a different one <strong>in</strong> history.<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!