08.02.2013 Views

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

malization of relations with the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1979,<br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> sought to put an end to it. In 1982, <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> got<br />

the Ronald Reagan adm<strong>in</strong>istration to issue the third<br />

jo<strong>in</strong>t U.S.-<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> communiqué to address the arms<br />

sales issue. Yet it was a noncommittal promise from<br />

the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>:<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> Government states that it does not<br />

seek to carry out a long-term policy of arms sales to<br />

Taiwan, that its arms sales to Taiwan will not exceed,<br />

either <strong>in</strong> qualitative or <strong>in</strong> quantitative terms, the level<br />

of those supplied <strong>in</strong> recent years s<strong>in</strong>ce the establishment<br />

of diplomatic relations between the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>, <strong>and</strong> that it <strong>in</strong>tends to reduce gradually its<br />

sales of arms to Taiwan, lead<strong>in</strong>g over a period of time<br />

to a f<strong>in</strong>al resolution. In so stat<strong>in</strong>g, the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong><br />

acknowledges <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>’s consistent position regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the thorough settlement of this issue. 74<br />

While negotiat<strong>in</strong>g with the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese, the Reagan<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istration privately provided six assurances to<br />

Taiwan that the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> 1) had not agreed to<br />

set a date for end<strong>in</strong>g arms sales; 2) had not agreed to<br />

hold prior consultations with the PRC regard<strong>in</strong>g arms<br />

sales to Taiwan; 3) would not play a mediation role<br />

between the PRC <strong>and</strong> ROC; 4) would not revise the<br />

TRA; 5) had not altered its position regard<strong>in</strong>g sovereignty<br />

over Taiwan; <strong>and</strong> 6) would not exert pressure<br />

on Taiwan to enter <strong>in</strong>to negotiation with the PRC. 75<br />

For better or for worse, the Shanghai Communiqué<br />

of 1972, the Jo<strong>in</strong>t Communiqué to establish U.S.-<br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> diplomatic relations of 1979, the Jo<strong>in</strong>t Communiqué<br />

on Arms Sales to Taiwan of 1982, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) of 1979 have become the<br />

basic documents “govern<strong>in</strong>g” the relations among<br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>, Taiwan, <strong>and</strong> the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. However, these<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!