08.02.2013 Views

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ise of the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> also spanned well over half<br />

a century follow<strong>in</strong>g its Civil War <strong>in</strong> the 1860s. <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong><br />

has a broader base (population <strong>in</strong> particular) but less<br />

developed economic conditions than most past great<br />

powers. It is reasonable that <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> has to take more<br />

time to reach its full potential. <strong>The</strong> first 30 years of<br />

its development <strong>and</strong> its uneasy <strong>in</strong>teraction with the<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> fit remarkably well with the pattern of<br />

the first trimester of the childbear<strong>in</strong>g process. 2<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the end of the Cold War, much has changed <strong>in</strong><br />

the <strong>in</strong>ternational system. Along with the rise of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>,<br />

we have also witnessed the emergence of other great<br />

powers (discussed <strong>in</strong> the earlier section of this analysis).<br />

Some argued that the U.S.-led “unipolar moment”<br />

would not last long <strong>and</strong> predicted an eventual transition<br />

either to a multipolar world with <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g one<br />

of the power centers 3 or a change of guard with <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong><br />

at the helm. 4 Others disputed <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>’s qualification as<br />

a contender to the U.S.-led <strong>in</strong>ternational system <strong>and</strong><br />

held doubts about the validity of a power transition<br />

between <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> <strong>and</strong> the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. 5 Many simply<br />

took the U.S.-<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> power transition for granted <strong>and</strong><br />

discussed various aspects of the U.S.-<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> relationship<br />

under the <strong>in</strong>fluence of power transition.<br />

This analysis contends that the development of the<br />

other great powers has collectively made the relative<br />

share of the U.S. world power smaller, but the ups <strong>and</strong><br />

downs of those other great powers are arguably sideshows<br />

of the evolv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternational order. <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>’s rise<br />

is by far the most conspicuous one.<br />

More importantly, <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> is the one with the potential<br />

<strong>and</strong> ambitions to become the next No. 1 nation <strong>in</strong><br />

the world <strong>and</strong> has made unremitt<strong>in</strong>g efforts to shape<br />

a new <strong>in</strong>ternational order for the future, although Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

leaders have repeatedly denied <strong>and</strong> downplayed<br />

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!