08.02.2013 Views

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ponents to U.S.-<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> military-to-military contacts<br />

suggest that the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> should limit these exchanges<br />

to high-level strategic dialogues, <strong>and</strong> keep<br />

the PLA out of touch with the U.S. military at the operational<br />

level. <strong>The</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> would be better off<br />

keep<strong>in</strong>g its military superiority over <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> <strong>and</strong> focus<br />

on measures that will ensure the safety of U.S. military<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Western Pacific, even if meant to st<strong>and</strong> firm<br />

on <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>’s military challenges. 232<br />

<strong>The</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese, however, have an entirely different<br />

take on U.S.-<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> military relations. <strong>The</strong>y hold the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g views: 233<br />

• <strong>The</strong> most fundamental problem <strong>in</strong> the U.S.-<br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> military-to-military relationship is the<br />

lack of trust between the two nations. Without<br />

this trust, this relationship is not susta<strong>in</strong>able.<br />

• <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> blames the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> for its cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

perception of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> as an enemy. With its<br />

antagonistic view, the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> takes every<br />

development <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> as a threat. Particularly,<br />

the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> never respects <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>’s rightful<br />

need to modernize its military power.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> that they have a consistent<br />

<strong>and</strong> pragmatic view of its relationship with<br />

the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>: it is neither a friend nor an enemy<br />

(非友非敌). <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> accepts that it will never<br />

become an allied friend to the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, but<br />

it can try to avoid becom<strong>in</strong>g a deadly enemy.<br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> holds its relationship with the <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>States</strong> as the most important one among its key<br />

foreign relations (重中之重) <strong>and</strong> will do everyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

possible to preserve this relationship. <strong>The</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese argue that the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> has an ambivalent<br />

attitude toward <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>; <strong>and</strong> U.S. policy<br />

toward <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> has vacillated between engage-<br />

196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!