08.02.2013 Views

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

The United States and China in Power Transition - Strategic Studies ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

provocative acts, adamantly opposes the U.S.<br />

military postur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Korean Pen<strong>in</strong>sula,<br />

charg<strong>in</strong>g that the real <strong>in</strong>tent of the <strong>in</strong>tensified<br />

U.S. military activities <strong>in</strong> Northeast Asia is<br />

a U.S. attempt to deter <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>. As recently as<br />

June 2011, <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> solicited Russia’s support to<br />

issue a jo<strong>in</strong>t statement openly denounc<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

U.S. approach: “the two countries pledged support<br />

for each other on a wide range of issues,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Russia’s security challenges from the<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>and</strong> Europe as well as U.S. pressure<br />

on <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Asia-Pacific regions.” 2 U.S.<br />

political <strong>and</strong> military leaders should see that,<br />

with <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong> <strong>and</strong> Russia st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the way, a<br />

military solution to the North Korea problem<br />

is not an option. Hasty military reactions to<br />

the North Korea problem are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly becom<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a po<strong>in</strong>t of contention between <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. This is dangerous to the<br />

power transition process.<br />

• In light of this situation, the U.S. reposition<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> reduction of military forces <strong>in</strong> South Korea<br />

appeared to be proper policy adjustments. In<br />

the years ahead, the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> should gradually<br />

turn the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g U.S. military forces <strong>in</strong><br />

the Korean Pen<strong>in</strong>sula from the decades-long<br />

tactical operations <strong>in</strong>to a strategic deterrence<br />

presence. This adjustment is consistent with<br />

the Nixon Doctr<strong>in</strong>e that expects our allies <strong>and</strong><br />

friendly nations <strong>in</strong> Asia to bear the primary responsibility<br />

for their security <strong>in</strong>terests, while<br />

the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> provides needed military,<br />

economic, <strong>and</strong> political support. In the meantime,<br />

the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> should take <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a</strong>’s advice<br />

to replace the Korean War Armistice with a<br />

peace treaty <strong>and</strong> normalize U.S. relations with<br />

xv

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!