30.04.2013 Views

History of Utah, 1540-1886 - Brigham Young University

History of Utah, 1540-1886 - Brigham Young University

History of Utah, 1540-1886 - Brigham Young University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

340<br />

MORMONISM AND POLYGAMY.<br />

The doctrine <strong>of</strong> blood atonement was early inculcated<br />

by the church, as a sacrifice necessary for salvation, and<br />

not, as many have asserted, in order to legalize murder.<br />

There were the altars and the <strong>of</strong>ferings <strong>of</strong> the old<br />

testament, and the great god-man sacrifice <strong>of</strong> the<br />

new. Christ made the atonement for the sins <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world by the shedding <strong>of</strong> his blood. By the laws <strong>of</strong><br />

the land, he who commits murder must atone for it<br />

by his own death. 6 There are sins <strong>of</strong> various de-<br />

5 The theory <strong>of</strong> blood atonement is that for certain sins the blood <strong>of</strong> the<br />

transgressor must be shed to save his soul. Among these sins are apostasy,<br />

the shedding <strong>of</strong> innocent blood, and unfaithfulness to marriage obligations<br />

on the part <strong>of</strong> the wife. Says <strong>Brigham</strong>, in a discourse delivered in Salt Lake<br />

City: 'There are sins which men commit for which they cannot receive forgiveness<br />

in this world, or in that which is to come, and if they had their<br />

eyes open to their true condition, they would be perfectly willing to have<br />

their blood spilled upon the ground, that the smoke there<strong>of</strong> might ascend to<br />

heaven as an <strong>of</strong>fering for their sins; and the smoking incense would atone for<br />

their sins; whereas, if such is not the case, they will stick to them and remain<br />

upon them in the spirit world. I know, when you hear my brethren<br />

telling about cutting people <strong>of</strong>f from the earth, that you consider it is strong<br />

doctrine; but it is to save them, not to destroy them. . .1 do know that there<br />

are sins committed, <strong>of</strong> such a nature that if the people did understand the<br />

doctrine <strong>of</strong> salvation they would tremble because <strong>of</strong> their situation. And<br />

furthermore, I know that there are transgressors who, if they knew themselves<br />

and the only condition upon which they can obtain forgiveness, would<br />

beg <strong>of</strong> their brethren to shed their blood, that the smoke there<strong>of</strong> might ascend<br />

to God as an <strong>of</strong>fering to appease the wrath that is kindled against them,<br />

and that the law might have its course. I will say further: I have had men<br />

come to me and <strong>of</strong>fer their lives to atone for their sins. . .There are sins that<br />

can be atoned for by an <strong>of</strong>fering upon an altar, as in ancient days; and there<br />

are sins that the blood <strong>of</strong> a lamb, <strong>of</strong> a calf, or <strong>of</strong> turtle-doves cannot remit,<br />

but they must be atoned for by the blood <strong>of</strong> the man.' And at another<br />

time: 'All mankind love themselves, and let these principles be known by<br />

an individual, and he would be glad to have his blood shed. That would be<br />

loving themselves, even unto an eternal exaltation. Will you love your<br />

brothers or sisters likewise when they have committed a sin that cannot<br />

be atoned for without the shedding <strong>of</strong> their blood? Will you love<br />

that man or woman well enough to shed their blood? That is what Jesus<br />

Christ meant... I could refer you to plenty <strong>of</strong> instances where men have<br />

been righteously slain in order to atone for their sins. I have seen scores<br />

and hundreds <strong>of</strong> people for whom there would have been a chance in the<br />

last resurrection if their lives had been taken and their blood spilled on the<br />

ground as a smoking incense to the almighty. . .1 have known a great many<br />

men who have left this church for whom there is no chance whatever for<br />

exaltation; but if their blood had been spilled it would have been better for<br />

them. This is loving our neighbor as ourselves; if he needs help, help him;<br />

and if he wants salvation, and it is necessary to spill his blood on the earth<br />

in order that he may be saved, spill it.' Deseret Xeivs, Oct. 1, 1S56, Feb.<br />

18, 1857. Following <strong>Brigham</strong>'s lead, Heber C. Kimball and Jedediah M.<br />

Grant taught the same doctrine during the religious revival, or so-called<br />

reformation, in <strong>Utah</strong>, in 1856-7, <strong>of</strong> which more later, Grant being the most<br />

vehement <strong>of</strong> the three. The reader will find these discourses reported at<br />

length in the Deseret News. The doctrine is very clearly explained in Pen-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!