30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

can be easily hacked.<br />

2.7.3 Legislative and Regulatory Barriers<br />

In order for e-Services, and by implication m-Services, to gain widespread acceptance,<br />

they must have the same standing as equivalent paper processes as argued by Brief<br />

(2003). Brief also pointed out that current frameworks based on the assumption that<br />

agencies work alone (e.g. performance management, accountability frameworks and an<br />

interdiction of data sharing) hindered collaboration.<br />

Brief (2003) also stressed that confusion about what exactly is in the law is another<br />

problem. Service providers may need clarification on what they can and cannot do,<br />

particularly in the areas of data security and technical standards. This would really<br />

affect small organisations with few resources. The cost of developing an e-Government<br />

or m-Government project in the wrong direction or using the wrong standard can be<br />

potentially very expensive. However, Goldstuck (2003) argues that the challenges of<br />

legislative barriers can be overcome.<br />

2.7.4 Challenges<br />

Heeks and Lallana (2008) list the following challenges for developing m-Government<br />

services:<br />

Cost: the implementation the deployment of e-Government is a costly exercise<br />

and extending its service delivery through m-Government thus create additional<br />

- 48 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!