View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
can be easily hacked.<br />
2.7.3 Legislative and Regulatory Barriers<br />
In order for e-Services, and by implication m-Services, to gain widespread acceptance,<br />
they must have the same standing as equivalent paper processes as argued by Brief<br />
(2003). Brief also pointed out that current frameworks based on the assumption that<br />
agencies work alone (e.g. performance management, accountability frameworks and an<br />
interdiction of data sharing) hindered collaboration.<br />
Brief (2003) also stressed that confusion about what exactly is in the law is another<br />
problem. Service providers may need clarification on what they can and cannot do,<br />
particularly in the areas of data security and technical standards. This would really<br />
affect small organisations with few resources. The cost of developing an e-Government<br />
or m-Government project in the wrong direction or using the wrong standard can be<br />
potentially very expensive. However, Goldstuck (2003) argues that the challenges of<br />
legislative barriers can be overcome.<br />
2.7.4 Challenges<br />
Heeks and Lallana (2008) list the following challenges for developing m-Government<br />
services:<br />
Cost: the implementation the deployment of e-Government is a costly exercise<br />
and extending its service delivery through m-Government thus create additional<br />
- 48 -