View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
any appropriate tools for measuring m-Readiness, ideas will be deduced from these<br />
tools to design the m-Readiness model. The m-Readiness model is discussed below.<br />
3.2 Defining m-Readiness<br />
Following m-Government definition explained previously in Chapter 2, it follows that<br />
m-Government readiness is define as government having the ability to communicate<br />
and deliver services among government organizations and to citizens via MWTs. In<br />
addition m-Government readiness can be defined as the people‟s readiness of using<br />
MWTs. To determine the m-Readiness of an organization, investigation must be on the<br />
usage of MWTs.<br />
Goldstuck (2005) developed a framework (Table: 3:4) to investigate the level of e-<br />
Readiness with respect to mobile technologies. The framework considers both the<br />
readiness of organization and the technology. The organisation can be considered to<br />
adopt any of the wireless and mobile solutions if more than half of the questions are<br />
positively answered.<br />
The answers to these questions may not provide enough information for the government<br />
to consider implementation in MWTs as the questions themselves are not enough to<br />
determine the technology readiness of an organisation. Technology maturity in an<br />
organisation is vital information that needs to be analysed.<br />
In an institution decision-makers decide on what type of technology to used which is<br />
refer to as Institutional readiness. This can be identify as one of the barriers to<br />
- 64 -