View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Technology<br />
Readiness of<br />
Target Segment<br />
High<br />
Low<br />
Stars<br />
Degree of Sophistication of Technology*<br />
- 71 -<br />
High<br />
High-impact projects<br />
Mission-Critical applications<br />
of high strategic advantage<br />
should be undertaken; highlevel<br />
commitment needed for<br />
success<br />
Future Potentials<br />
Wait and see<br />
Applications more complex;<br />
go forward with pilots;<br />
educate/train employees;<br />
wait for mature technology<br />
Low<br />
Low-Hanging Fruit<br />
Go for immediate wireless<br />
deployment<br />
High probability of successful<br />
adoption<br />
Near Harvest<br />
Educate/train target segment<br />
Wireless deployment with<br />
extensive training; significant<br />
chance of success<br />
Figure 3:2 Preparing for wireless and mobile technology in government. Source (Chang, et al., 2003).<br />
Again this checklist can only be considered as a guide as previously discussed and a<br />
starting point for government organisations to decide on whether they are technology<br />
ready to deploy m-Government. As Goldstuck (Goldstuck, 2003) pointed out answering<br />
yes to all check list does not necessarily mean that MWTs implementation and<br />
deployment will be successful. However, it can assist managers in identifying any risks,<br />
issues or barriers that can be addressed at the earliest.<br />
If Kirsten‟s model of measuring m-Readiness compared to the way UN and EIU model<br />
measures e-Readiness level, there is a huge gap. The model used by Kirsten‟s considers<br />
technology adoption while the UN and EIU use the indices that are more<br />
comprehensive.